mplayer-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Original]

Re: [MPlayer-users] Illegal binaries...


To: mplayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [MPlayer-users] Illegal binaries...
From: Balazs Lengyak <mplayer@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 10:42:29 +0100
In-reply-to: <20011108102843.37b39ba2.br@zde.cz>; from br@zde.cz on Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 10:28:43AM +0100
References: <200111071701.fA7H18K124184@Stud-Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0111081017340.2703-100000@spider.sofia.ifao.net> <20011108102843.37b39ba2.br@zde.cz>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

> yeah, source and binaries are just an information. Only one difference 
> between source and binaries is that source can be read easier by human. So if 
> source is legal than even binaries are legal but as has been said it's 
> illegal to use it.
> BR
But then an again, a binary is just ONE NUMBER. Large number, yes, but still
a natural number. Question is, how large numbers can be protected by
copyright? Say, I copyright 0, and Arpi copyrigths 1, and then on, no binary
could be released without our permission because every binary consists of
just our binaries in various order. ;)

Maybe there should be a trial, where one should blame one another for
violating copyright, the another would say he/she just wrote down one
natural number. That would make up a precedence and from then on, no binary
could be protected by copyright, or, on if the judge decides to protect a
natural number by copyright, well... who knows?:)
Number-brokers;)))

It has not been properly thought over.

-- 
Regards,
Balazs Lengyak
--------------
PGP public key: http://bivanbi.elender.hu/gpg-pub.key
Key fingerprint: CE32 0ADE BA22 12E2 2407  8376 FF78 1F26 B9C5 2009


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]