Re: [MPlayer-users] vcd problems (new & relatively new)

[Dave Botsch <dwb7@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Strangely enough, it seems to still be calling "nanosleep" . .

here's the strace output:

write(9, "\361\377\361\377\360\377\360\377\355\377\356\377\361\377"..., 57344)
= 57344
gettimeofday({1017003267, 704237}, {300, 0}) = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGSEGV, {0x4006243c, [SEGV], SA_RESTART|0x4000000}, {0x4006243c,
[SEGV], SA_RESTART|0x4000000}, 8) = 0
--- SIGPROF (Profiling timer expired) ---
sigreturn()                             = ? (mask now [])
rt_sigaction(SIGSEGV, {0x4006243c, [SEGV], SA_RESTART|0x4000000}, {0x4006243c,
[SEGV], SA_RESTART|0x4000000}, 8) = 0
gettimeofday({1017003267, 707493}, {300, 0}) = 0
gettimeofday({1017003267, 707533}, {300, 0}) = 0
gettimeofday({1017003267, 707580}, {300, 0}) = 0
ioctl(9, 0x80045017, 0xbfffe724)        = 0
nanosleep({9, 690023000},  <unfinished ...>
[dbotsch@xxxxxx main]$ 

and attached is the used config.h in compiling after a make distclean


you can see here, using -v with mplayer, the difference in output when using
-mc 0 and -mc 10, respectively.

you can see with -mc 0, after I skipped to the end of a track, that it prints
out some more user_data stuff.

SEEK: A: 148.361  V: 148.321  A-V: 0.040   76/276   0%  0%  0.0% 0 0 0%
SEEK: A: 160.577  V: 160.567  A-V: 0.010   11/311   8%  5% 15.2% 0 0 0%
SEEK: A: 172.819  V: 172.812  A-V: 0.006   35/335   7%  5% 17.2% 0 0 0%
user_data: len=  6  00 81 18 61 'aG'0.006  625/625   8%  5% 17.6% 9 0 0%
user_data: len=  6  00 82 18 61 'aG'
user_data: len= 23  65 6E 63 6F 'encoded by TMPGEnc b12a'
A:   4.0 V:   3.9 A-V:  0.047 ct:  0.006  733/733   7%  5% 16.1% 9 0 0%

MPlayer interrupted by signal 2 in module: unknown 

and now for -mc 10 where it locks up at the end of the track

SEEK: A: 169.013  V: 169.009  A-V: 0.005   16/316   7%  4% 14.9% 0 0 0%
A:   0.3 V: 182.1 A-V:-181.788 ct:-10.020  709/709   8%  3% 15.7% 1 0 0%

MPlayer interrupted by signal 2 in module: sleep 

*** free_stream() called ***

so, I guess the usleep calls instead on my system are actually nanosleep calls?
Interesting, at any rate.

On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 09:08:03PM +0100, Attila Kinali wrote:
> [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 17:09:11 -0500
> Dave Botsch <dwb7@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> > nanosleep({9, 676646000},  <unfinished ...>
> 
> Hmm.. does that mean it blocks in nanosleep ?
> 
> Try to replace 
> #define HAVE_NANOSLEEP 1
> in config.h to 
> #undef HAVE_NANOSLEEP
> and compile again
> 
>               Attila Kinali
> -- 
> I am a moslem, i am a terrorist.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTFM!!!  http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/DOCS
> Search:  http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/cgi-bin/htsearch
> http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users

-- 
********************************
David William Botsch
dwb7@xxxxxxxxxxx
********************************

config.h
Description: Text document