mplayer-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Original]

Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: Recoring this *.ram to WAV with mplayer workswhi


To: "MPlayer usage questions, feature requests, bug reports" <mplayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: Recoring this *.ram to WAV with mplayer workswhile logged in but not from at.
From: The Wanderer <inverseparadox@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:45:36 -0400
Delivered-to: itdp@localhost
Delivered-to: mplayer-users@mplayerhq.hu
In-reply-to: <20060411200627.GA6364@rathann.pekin.waw.pl>
Organization: This space intentionally left blank.
References: <20060409193758.GA5255@rathann.pekin.waw.pl> <bb5og3-i6r.ln1@news.ducksburg.com><443A5DB7.7050400@comcast.net> <ju7sg3-2ka.ln1@news.ducksburg.com><443BB7D7.7030007@comcast.net> <iprsg3-0hu.ln1@news.ducksburg.com><443BCEEA.4070903@comcast.net> <20060411160839.GA24900@ikaruga.co.uk> <20060411172710.GC4820@rathann.pekin.waw.pl> <443C08B1.9060703@comcast.net><20060411200627.GA6364@rathann.pekin.waw.pl>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

On Tuesday, 11 April 2006 at 21:51, The Wanderer wrote:

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:

To correct it further still, Christian's latest packages are very
good and don't have any questionable patches anymore.

...but still create that invalid version number, apparently.

Not any more[1], AFAICT.

I was judging by the fact that the package Adam installed, just earlier today, had the invalid version number. It appeared, by the *package* version number, to be based on CVS from March 25th - but the place in the version number where the CVS date would be given was an empty string, leaving the two consecutive hyphens which are the symptom of the invalid version number.

I had noticed the improvements (by proxy, I don't test it out
myself), but was under the impression that some MPlayer developers
still thought his packages were incorrectly handled at best. Was I
incorrect?

You haven't been incorrect until recently. Now[1] I see no reason to talk badly about Christian's packages.

Very well. If the problem *has* in fact been fixed, then I'll adjust my advice and/or rhetoric accordingly.

[1] As of 25.03.

(See above.)


--
      The Wanderer

Warning: Simply because I argue an issue does not mean I agree with any
side of it.

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.

_______________________________________________
MPlayer-users mailing list
MPlayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]