Re: [MPlayer-users] Re: divx 6

[Alexander Noe' <alexander.noe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Matthias Wieser schrieb:

> > Divx is slow and bad.
>
> DivX: 70fps
> LAVC: 26fps
> Xvid: 71fps
> [...]
> http://www.doom9.org/index.html?/codecs-main-105-1.htm

Slow and bad probably referred to the first few divx4 versions.

> > Historically Xvid is slow and bad.
> ...only on mplayer-dev-eng
> > Apparently  
> > that's not the case for encoding anymore 
> Hear, hear..
> > but it's definitely the case 
> > for decoding with xvid...
>
>
> Please insert your benchmark numbers:
> lavc: [...]fps
> xvid: [...]fps

mplayer still can't even read open-dml AVI files (don't forget that 
AVI-Mux GUI's low overhead style open-dml files are just a special 
type of open-dml that is totally spec compliant) as specified in 
1996... you simply can't expect some people to catch up with time as 
time goes on. It's a waste of time.

Once a guy asked me why his liteon cd writer didn't work with 
cdrecord, so I told him to use -raw96r. He said cdrecord didn't accept 
the command. When I told him to update cdrecord, he answered "but i've 
updated it only 2 years ago!?". Exactly that is the mentality you are 
trying to break...


Alex

_______________________________________________
MPlayer-users mailing list
MPlayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users