transcode-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Original]

Re: [transcode-users] NTSC still not ok


To: transcode-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [transcode-users] NTSC still not ok
From: Jason Lunz <lunz-mlist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 13:43:13 -0400
References: <20020521133403.47fbc5d6.torsten@inetw.net> <200205212057.g4LKvW707158@prison.castle>

joern@xxxxxx said:
> Yes, the -o parameter is anyway ignored by transcode in case of using
> the new core. But with my patch no "-psu.avi" is added to the argument
> of --psu_mode anymore, so you can specify "--psu_mode /dev/null" to
> achieve the same effect of "-o /dev/null" with standard core.

something like this is needed, but shouldn't transcode really recognize
that --no_split + --psu_mode should just use the -o filename? i.e.

transcode --psu_mode foo                   -> foo-psu00.avi, foo-psu01.avi, ...
transcode -o foo.avi --psu_mode --no_split -> foo.avi

actually, that makes --no_split redundant. transcode could just
understand that if --psu_mode has no argument, it should do --no_split
and use the standard output filename.

Jason


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]