[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Original]
Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg
>> > Obvious solution: lower vrc_maxrate. Even the default only puts it
>> > at 9000 kbps, and raising it farther really won't gain you anything
>> > noticeable. If you continue having problems, lower it even further. See
>> > also http://www.transcoding.org/cgi-bin/transcode?FFmpeg_Vs._Mpeg2enc
>
>I've never seen a reason to use a value different than the default, so
>just leave it alone.
The reason is that 2-pass FFmpeg goes over the max bitrate, so you may
need to reduce it to stay within spec (as we've gone over several times
before...).
--Andrew Church
achurch@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://achurch.org/
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, (continued)
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Phil Ehrens, 2005/03/02
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Andrew Church, 2005/03/02
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Erik Slagter, 2005/03/02
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Andrew Church, 2005/03/02
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Phil Ehrens, 2005/03/02
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Phil Ehrens, 2005/03/02
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Andrew Church, 2005/03/03
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Phil Ehrens, 2005/03/03
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Andrew Church, 2005/03/03
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Erik Slagter, 2005/03/02
- Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg,
Andrew Church <=
Re: [transcode-users] rc buffer underflow with ffmpeg, Erik Slagter, 2005/03/02