transcode-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Original]

Re: [transcode-users] Odd TMPEnc combo problem - "new RIFF chunkthrows i


To: transcode Users Mailing List <transcode-users@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [transcode-users] Odd TMPEnc combo problem - "new RIFF chunkthrows it"
From: Phil Ehrens <phil@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:48:27 -0700
Delivered-to: itdp@localhost
In-reply-to: <ba25e01e0607060910s1008190n95437a5cffc1e4bf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ba25e01e0607060842r1a634d8ay1c32bec8f5ca4674@mail.gmail.com><20060706155843.GA16776@webserver><ba25e01e0607060910s1008190n95437a5cffc1e4bf@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

Nick Humphries wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> 
> >> Is there any possibility of disabling this chunking so that the large
> >> file is one large chunk? TMPGEnc can handle plain uncompressed AVI
> >> files up to 4GB.
> >
> >AFAIK this is a limitation defined in the avi standard. Why don't
> >you just use Transcode instead? And AFAIK, Transcode and Mencoder will
> >both happily read huge avi files and convert them into, yeccch, mpeg1.
> 
> I've found that TMPGEnc produces visibly better quality MPEGs for my
> animations and other MPEGs and I'd need to be proven wrong before I
> switch.
> 
> Of course, feel free to give me a command to run that will prove me wrong :)

At 352x288 there is a visible difference?! What kind of content
are you encoding? Is your target VCD?

Can anybody comment on *why* TMPGEnc produces higher quality
output? Is it just well-chosen defaults? I find that I can
do pretty nearly whatever I want in terms of visual quality
by using lavc options and filter plugins.


[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]