mplayer-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Original]

Re: [MPlayer-users] vhq

To: "MPlayer user's list." <mplayer-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [MPlayer-users] vhq
From: Ian <the.pond@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:13:03 +0000
In-reply-to: <200301131642.49769.jms@be.itmasters.com>
References: <200301131642.49769.jms@be.itmasters.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021229 
[Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jean-Marc Stévenne wrote:

Does using vhq only for the last pass (to speedup the first pass) is a bad idea? Does using vhq in the first (video) pass gives better results?

Is it better to use 2 passes without vhq or one pass with vhq?
It looks like vhq gives the same kind of enhancement a 2 pass encoding has versus a single pass encoding.

. . . and while we're on the subject, I'd like to ask the same question about vqmax and vqmin.

Any ideas?

- -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
begin GPG D694 FB76 12FC 94A7 4557 9951 8734 A4AC 7AA4 141E
Ian Smith
Worst . . . signature . . . ever !

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+IvOmhzSkrHqkFB4RAkhaAJ45TcZoSPam8XgRqmnamEUw0hH8SwCfT/UL
jPjuCh73AmoE0GJoImfraKo=
=A78J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
RTFM!!!  http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/DOCS
Search:  http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/cgi-bin/htsearch
http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]