|
| To: | transcode Users Mailing List <transcode-users@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Subject: | Re: [transcode-users] Recording from v4l2? |
| From: | Adam K Kirchhoff <adamk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:07:14 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | itdp@localhost |
| In-reply-to: | <20041220190909.GA2265@funk.gsky.dom> |
| References: | <1103135886.8990.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41C08BB8.7040807@voicenet.com> <1103138498.8990.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41C0AE40.7030601@voicenet.com> <1103190639.3385.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41C175DE.6030103@voicenet.com> <1103199173.3385.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41C18103.2000400@voicenet.com> <1103201502.3385.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <41C1B3D2.8060306@voicenet.com><20041220190909.GA2265@funk.gsky.dom> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; DragonFly i386; en-US;rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041206 |
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 11:12:02AM -0500, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
[ adamk@xxxxx - ~ ]: transcode -H 0 -x v4l2 -i /dev/null -p /dev/dsp0 -o output.avi -y xvid4 -c 150
^^^^^^ that's not valid. don't know why transcode doesn't complain, though.
let's go about this another way.
please apply the patch below and show the output.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |