From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 3 11:25:08 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41034126D8B for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:25:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEBB14270; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:29:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA2B14244 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:29:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E29152132 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:27:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:25:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [XviD-devel] DiamondSearch broken? X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi, I didn't contribute much, lately, but when I just checked ME to test some different ideas, I noticed that I don't understand xvid_me_DiamondSearch() anymore (in estimation_common.c). It's not used, except for quality==0, I guess, since AdvDiamondSearch does the work, but still, I have the impression it's broken: After only 1 step of the diamond, it will terminate, if the diagonal checks are not successful, although it should of cause continue until a minimum is reached. Or am I just too blind to see? If you see the same, I can commit a fix. gruel _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 3 11:53:50 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF63B126D8B for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:53:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00A314122; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:58:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from grunt24.ihug.com.au (grunt24.ihug.com.au [203.109.249.144]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673ED140AA for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:57:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dsl-158.160.240.220.lns02-waym-adl.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.160.158] by grunt24.ihug.com.au with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CE33h-0006aK-00; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:53:37 +1000 Message-ID: <415FCD0D.1050807@ihug.com.au> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:27:33 +0930 From: Radek Czyz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] DiamondSearch broken? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Christoph Lampert wrote: > Hi, > > I didn't contribute much, lately, but when I just checked ME > to test some different ideas, I noticed that I don't understand > xvid_me_DiamondSearch() anymore (in estimation_common.c). > It's not used, except for quality==0, I guess, since AdvDiamondSearch does > the work, but still, I have the impression it's broken: After only 1 step > of the diamond, it will terminate, if the diagonal checks are not > successful, although it should of cause continue until a minimum is > reached. > Or am I just too blind to see? > > If you see the same, I can commit a fix. Oh, I haven't touched this code for *ages* now. DiamondSearch is reasonably important because it's used in first pass and also in P/B/I decision, where catching real motion is the actual goal of the function. [right here was an explaination why the code looks right to me. I deleted it] Lemme guess, I think I see the problem: loop ends when iDirection==0, but iDirection might get set to zero after the first four checks? If that's the case, AdvDiamond has the same bug... Great >_< Radek _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 3 12:28:22 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D701D126D8B for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:28:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3841614603; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:32:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9216C0B6 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C160751024 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:30:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:28:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] DiamondSearch broken? In-Reply-To: <415FCD0D.1050807@ihug.com.au> Message-ID: References: <415FCD0D.1050807@ihug.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Radek Czyz wrote: > > Lemme guess, I think I see the problem: loop ends when iDirection==0, > but iDirection might get set to zero after the first four checks? Exactly, because iDirection is set to 0 before the diagonals are checked. It's easy to get rid off, simply not set it to 0, but to 12 (=4+8) if the diamond step was 1 or 2, or to 3, if the step was 4 or 8. This might be overwritten by the diagonals, but if not, it's exactly the value needed. > If that's the case, AdvDiamond has the same bug... Great >_< I think not, because AdvDiamond doesn't terminal automatically, when iDirection is 0 at the end of the loop, but it's "break"ed (sorry, "broken" I mean ;-) only when iDirection is 0 after the diamond step itself _and_ the subsequent diagonal checks. chl _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 3 16:20:17 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38456126D8B for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 16:20:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB283140AD; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 16:24:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with SMTP id B777E13BFC for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 16:24:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 17499 invoked by uid 65534); 3 Oct 2004 14:20:09 -0000 Received: from DSL01.212.114.238.25.NEFkom.net (EHLO DSL01.212.114.238.25.NEFkom.net) (212.114.238.25) by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 03 Oct 2004 16:20:09 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14339442 From: Henning Moll To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 15:20:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410031520.37833.newsScott@gmx.de> Subject: [XviD-devel] segmentation fault X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hello! Unfortunately, i have problems using the xvid codec. The whole thing is a little bit strange, so i will tell you all details i recognized up to now: The codec will fail with an segmentation fault _mostly_ during the second pass of two-pass-encoding. I checked this with several programms on different OSes: (mencoder, transcode, gordian knot). All show the same problem. Now the interesting thing: On the same data, with same parameters, the segmentation fault appears on different frames. It's kind of random. Now you think of an hardware problem, but i don't think it is: I don't have any similar behaviour with other software. Every other codec is working with all of the programms mentioned above, but not yours... :-( To weaken that hardware failure theory, i also recompiled transcode and xvid without special hardware usage (assembly code, MMX, and so). But the same effect there (only hours later ..;-) The chance of such a segmentation fault is not very likely, but it happens often enough to make encoding with xvid nearly impossible. On different tries it crashes in different functions, but at the moment i remember only on symbol name: transfer_8to16sub_mmx All the other functions where it happends sound similar. Hmm, now i need your help. What can i do to track down that problem more? Any suggestions? I don't know much of CPUs and that stuff, but I thought of something like a hardware random number generator. Is there something like that? Maybe there exists a model range of my CPU which have a slightly different implementation. Maybe that slightly difference is enought to let your code segfault? BTW: i have an AMD XP1800+ Are you agree with my theory, that it can not be a hardware _defekt_, because other (comparable) programms do not have any problems? If not, why? Kind regards Henning _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 3 17:35:45 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5C4126D8B for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:35:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8FB141DB; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:39:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAF413F02 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:39:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FE9519C2 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:37:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 17:35:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] segmentation fault In-Reply-To: <200410031520.37833.newsScott@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <200410031520.37833.newsScott@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi, I'll start with the end of your mail, first: On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Henning Moll wrote: > I don't know much of CPUs and that stuff, but I thought of something > like a hardware random number generator. Is there something like that? there is such a thing, but it's not used in XviD. XviD should behave exactly identical when run twice on the same hardware. > Maybe there exists a model range of my CPU which have a slightly > different implementation. Maybe that slightly difference is enought to > let your code segfault? BTW: i have an AMD XP1800+ > > Are you agree with my theory, that it can not be a hardware _defekt_, > because other (comparable) programms do not have any problems? If not, > why? Definitely not. Nondeterministic errors are almost always due to hardware. I would asusme it's either a problem with RAM (by far the most hardware problems are RAM), or an overheaded CPU or something like that). Other programs produce other access patterns RAM and instructions, you cannot be sure the problem would pop up somewhere else. First thing I would suggest is to run a RAM checker overnight. Second thing is to run a CPU-intensive thing (e.g. "cpuburn-in" for a while), or possible both together. If both show no problems, we can search for a special defect in your CPU or so. I used to have a CPU with broken MMX, but that was years ago, I haven't heard anything like that about AMD XPs. chl _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 3 19:27:34 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B456B126D8B for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03111140E8; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:31:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 574BD9C50 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:31:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 11834 invoked by uid 65534); 3 Oct 2004 17:27:28 -0000 Received: from DSL01.212.114.238.25.NEFkom.net (EHLO DSL01.212.114.238.25.NEFkom.net) (212.114.238.25) by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 03 Oct 2004 19:27:28 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14339442 From: Henning Moll To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] segmentation fault Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:27:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200410031520.37833.newsScott@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410031927.27238.newsScott@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi Christoph, thanks for your reply! On Sunday 03 October 2004 17:35, Christoph Lampert wrote: > > I don't know much of CPUs and that stuff, but I thought of > > something like a hardware random number generator. Is there > > something like that? > > there is such a thing, but it's not used in XviD. XviD should behave > exactly identical when run twice on the same hardware. Do you know, whether this random generator is used by transcode or mencoder? if not, i can exclude this from being the the source of the problem.. > First thing I would suggest is to run a RAM checker overnight. Second > thing is to run a CPU-intensive thing (e.g. "cpuburn-in" for a > while), or possible both together. If both show no problems, we can > search for a special defect in your CPU or so. I allready used 'memtest' for a couple of hours without any error. I will give 'cpuburn-in' a try. If that also does not show anything, i will come back to this thread, ok? BTW: Do you have any test programms, which test xvid without relying on other software as transcode/mencoder? That would be great to sort them out. Thanks for your help so far! Henning _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 3 19:32:49 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E21126D8B for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:32:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BE6142C7; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:37:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AF4B141C1 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:36:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 10877 invoked by uid 65534); 3 Oct 2004 17:32:44 -0000 Received: from L1309P30.dipool.highway.telekom.at (EHLO njuuus.desdemona.ssw.uni-linz.ac.at) (62.46.227.158) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 03 Oct 2004 19:32:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1641027 Received: from gaea (HELO gmx.at) [127.0.0.1] by njuuus.desdemona.ssw.uni-linz.ac.at (140.78.145.231) with ESMTP (Classic Hamster Version 2.0 Build 2.0.0.1) ; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:34:26 +0200 Message-ID: <41603822.49E92233@njuuus.desdemona.ssw.uni-linz.ac.at> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 19:34:26 +0200 From: Kurt Bernhard Pruenner Organization: Sysadmins Anonymous X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] segmentation fault References: <200410031520.37833.newsScott@gmx.de> <200410031927.27238.newsScott@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posting-Agent: Hamster/2.0.0.1 (with KorrNews) X-Message-Flag: Outlook not so good. (Magic 8-Ball) Lines: 21 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Henning Moll wrote: > Do you know, whether this random generator is used by transcode or > mencoder? if not, i can exclude this from being the the source of the > problem.. Well, unless you've installed a driver for it under Linux *and* are running some process that uses it to add to the kernel's entropy pool it's not going to be used. > I allready used 'memtest' for a couple of hours without any error. I > will give 'cpuburn-in' a try. If that also does not show anything, i > will come back to this thread, ok? I'd try running Prime95 for a few hours; it's a standalone app and *really* stresses both CPU and RAM: http://www.mersenne.org/freesoft.htm -- Kurt Bernhard Pruenner --- Haendelstrasse 17 --- 4020 Linz --- Austria .......It might be written "Mindfuck", but it's spelt "L-A-I-N"....... np: Shadow Huntaz - Sick Of This Shit (Corrupt Data) _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 3 19:54:43 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFC0126D8B for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:54:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C9B1460A; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:58:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CC7140AA for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:58:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D258651990 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:56:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 19:54:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] segmentation fault In-Reply-To: <200410031927.27238.newsScott@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <200410031520.37833.newsScott@gmx.de> <200410031927.27238.newsScott@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Henning Moll wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > thanks for your reply! > > On Sunday 03 October 2004 17:35, Christoph Lampert wrote: > > > I don't know much of CPUs and that stuff, but I thought of > > > something like a hardware random number generator. Is there > > > something like that? > > > > there is such a thing, but it's not used in XviD. XviD should behave > > exactly identical when run twice on the same hardware. > > Do you know, whether this random generator is used by transcode or > mencoder? if not, i can exclude this from being the the source of the > problem.. No, nobody uses it. And btw Athlon XP doesn't have one, but some VIA chips do. > BTW: Do you have any test programms, which test xvid without relying on > other software as transcode/mencoder? That would be great to sort them > out. There's "xvid_bench" in the xvidcore/examples directory. That calculates CRC for the most frequently used routines. Except for some mpeg_quant routines (which is explained in output), none of those should report a CRC error. gruel _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 4 12:50:11 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85A2126D8B for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:50:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECD2140AD; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:54:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from hotmail.com (bay13-dav2.bay13.hotmail.com [64.4.31.176]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8384BFD4 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:54:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 03:50:01 -0700 Received: from 150.101.157.187 by BAY13-DAV2.phx.gbl with DAV; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:49:19 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [150.101.157.187] X-Originating-Email: [suxen_drol@hotmail.com] X-Sender: suxen_drol@hotmail.com Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 20:49:09 +1000 From: suxen_drol To: "Stanislav Ocovaj" In-Reply-To: <000001c4a992$3e08cce0$1304f0d5@a> References: <000001c4a992$3e08cce0$1304f0d5@a> Message-Id: <20041004203824.7D7E.SUXEN_DROL@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.09.01 [en] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Oct 2004 10:50:01.0110 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5D7DB60:01C4A9FF] Cc: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: [XviD-devel] Re: xvid bug report X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: pross@xvid.org, xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org hello, xvid does not actually support decoding (or encoding) of field predicted material. the MACROBLOCK fields you mentioned are not really used. none the less, xvid should at least parse the backwards- predication field flags, to prevent loosing sync with the bitstream. cheers, -- pete On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 23:37:13 +0200 "Stanislav Ocovaj" wrote: > Dear Mr. Ross, > > I was examining the xvidcore source code and found something that looks like > a bug to me. The particular code is in the function decoder_bframe() in decoder.c: > > if (mb->field_pred) { > mb->field_for_top = BitstreamGetBit(bs); > DPRINTF(XVID_DEBUG_MB,"decp: field_for_top: %i\n", mb->field_for_top); > mb->field_for_bot = BitstreamGetBit(bs); > DPRINTF(XVID_DEBUG_MB,"decp: field_for_bot: %i\n", mb->field_for_bot); > } > > The MPEG-4 spec (ISO IEC 14496-2, section 6.2.6.3 - Interlaced information) says: > > if (field_prediction) { > if (vop_coding_type == "P" || > (vop_coding_type == "B" && > mb_type != "001")) { > forward_top_field_reference > forward_bottom_field_reference > } > if ((vop_coding_type == "B") && > (mb_type != "0001")) { > backward_top_field_reference > backward_bottom_field_reference > } > > So, according to the MPEG-4 spec, for bidirectionaly field-predicted macroblock of a B-VOP > (field_prediction == "1", vop_coding_type == "B", and mb_type == "01"), there > are supposed to be two sets of two field select flags present in the bitstream, but in xvid code, only > one set is read. The MACROBLOCK structure itself also supports only one set of field select flags > which is used for both forward and backward references in bidirectionaly coded mb's. I've also noticed > that the output string in DPRINTF function call starts with "decp:", so I suspect that this code was > just copy-pasted from the decoder_pframe() function. Is this a bug in xvid code or I misunderstood > the code or MPEG-4 spec? > > Sincerely Yours, > > Stanislav Ocovaj > -- pete _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 4 18:25:59 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB3C126D8B for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:25:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB1A13BFC; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:30:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mail2.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at (mail2.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at [140.78.3.69]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D087A9C9 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:30:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tzu.jkh.uni-linz.ac.at (tzu.jkh.uni-linz.ac.at [193.171.41.118]) by mail2.edvz.uni-linz.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i94GPp7b056698 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 18:25:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from k0055217@students.uni-linz.ac.at) From: Thomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6ckerbauer?= To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1096907156.1972.1.camel@koe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 18:25:56 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Subject: [XviD-devel] XVID_CSP_RGB X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi I'm working on an application which gets 24-bit RGB input data to compress with xvid. As I noticed xvid doesn't support the 24-bit RGB colorspace in the current version (it did in 0.9) (now XVID_CSP_BGR is the only 24-bit colorspace supported). I know that it would be possible to implement the colorspace conversion in the application and pass YV12 data to xvid, but I thought since 24-bit RGB is a quite common format it might be better if it's directly supported in xvid (especially since there are only a few lines to add to get support for it). So I've made a patch which adds a XVID_CSP_RGB colorspace. http://193.171.40.16/xvid/xvid_24_bit_rgb_colorspace.diff It would be nice if XVID_CSP_RGB would be added again (or was it removed for any special reason?) -- Thomas _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Tue Oct 5 12:38:35 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F26126D8B for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:38:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6359613C30; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:42:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from scamper.lut.ac.uk (scamper.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.219]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDA4C0A6 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:42:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [158.125.1.220] (helo=jamie.lut.ac.uk) by scamper.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CEmi5-0008Ri-O0 for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:38:22 +0100 Received: from apache by jamie.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.41) id 1CEmi5-0006DV-Hf for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:38:21 +0100 Received: from ra.lut.ac.uk (ra.lut.ac.uk [131.231.24.34]) by student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk (IMP) with HTTP for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:38:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1096972701.4162799d7e590@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:38:21 +0100 From: Tom Jacobs To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Changes to get_pmv2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 131.231.24.34 X-Scan-Signature: 9b3e38cf241aea6f88722dbd01169c4e X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org hi I'm back to threading xvid after a week or so writing reports and have a few (probably basic) questions about the variables and bitstream. I'm kinda confused by mv16, mvs[] and pmvs[]. which one of these are the differential prediction that is written to the bitstream and thus the one i will need to recalculate? are all 4 values of the array written or just a specific one? i know these are probably simple questions but they are kinda confusing me. also has anyone got a url for the actually iso mpeg4 standard? this would help me with some of these questions i would guess. Thanks Tom Quoting Christoph Lampert : > On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Tom Jacobs wrote: > > > hi > > > > my work on mpeg2 has only been simulated in an ideal SimpleScalar > simulator. > > The software from ftp://ftp.cs.wisc.edu/sohi/Code/simplescalar ? > > > so no realworld results. but it did show a 96% complexity reduction for > 20 > > processors on a 320x240 image. > > Hm, can you explain that? 96% complexity reduction means what? > That 20 CPUs in parallel need only 4% of the time that 1 CPU needs? > That would be a speedup factor of 25, which I supposed is impossible > (well, at least very unlikely). > > And how did you parallelization look like? Just ME? Or everything? > I'm really curious, because I did some experiments with parallel video > encoding a while ago myself. If you stuff is "private", maybe we can > discuss via private mail: gruel@gmx.de > > gruel > > _______________________________________________ > XviD-devel mailing list > XviD-devel@xvid.org > http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel > _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Tue Oct 5 13:21:06 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF86126D8B for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:21:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B879A141BD; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:25:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mail.ln9.net (rrcs-24-73-193-138.se.biz.rr.com [24.73.193.138]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2B513C30 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 13:25:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.77] (fajita.ln9.net [192.168.100.77]) by mail.ln9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2AC888A9 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 07:20:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <41628397.7010203@leoninedev.com> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 07:20:55 -0400 From: Bryan Mayland Organization: Leonine Development, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Changes to get_pmv2 References: <1096972701.4162799d7e590@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <1096972701.4162799d7e590@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Tom Jacobs wrote: >also has anyone got a url for the actually iso mpeg4 standard? this would >help me with some of these questions i would guess. > > As far as I know, this document is copyrighted so you probably won't find it on anyone's site. You can purchase it from ISO.org though. I believe MPEG-4 is ISO-14496. You might also check the Heinrich-Hertz Institute web site's MPEG section, but it appears to be down right now. http://wwwam.hhi.de/mpeg-video Bry _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Tue Oct 5 16:23:35 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7ADD126D8B for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:23:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B99141D9; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:27:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from grunt25.ihug.com.au (grunt25.ihug.com.au [203.109.249.145]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AA2141C8 for ; Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:27:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dsl-158.160.240.220.lns02-waym-adl.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.160.158] by grunt25.ihug.com.au with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CEqDl-0006dq-00; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:23:18 +1000 Message-ID: <4162AE51.2000007@ihug.com.au> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 23:53:13 +0930 From: Radek Czyz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Changes to get_pmv2 References: <1096972701.4162799d7e590@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <1096972701.4162799d7e590@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Tom Jacobs wrote: > I'm back to threading xvid after a week or so writing reports and have a few > (probably basic) questions about the variables and bitstream. > > I'm kinda confused by mv16, mvs[] and pmvs[]. which one of these are the > differential prediction that is written to the bitstream and thus the one i > will need to recalculate? are all 4 values of the array written or just a > specific one? pmvs are the ones written to the bitstream. As for how many, that depends on macroblock mode: if mode==MODE_INTER4V, all four are written if mode=MODE_INTER and mb->mcsel==0 (normal inter block), it's only pmv[0] that is written otherwise, (MODE_INTRA or mcsel==1), nothing is written. That's for p-frames and s-frames. Radek _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Thu Oct 7 20:15:38 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE614126D8B for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:15:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC4314166; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:19:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from web8407.mail.in.yahoo.com (web8407.mail.in.yahoo.com [202.43.219.155]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 657F913F25 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:19:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20041007181527.98659.qmail@web8407.mail.in.yahoo.com> Received: from [152.2.131.86] by web8407.mail.in.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:15:27 PDT Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:15:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Manoj Kumar Ampalam To: xvid-devel@xvid.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [XviD-devel] Scalability X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi, Is spatial scalability enabled in the current version of xvid1.0.2. thanks manoj __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Thu Oct 7 21:26:28 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FF3126D8B for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:26:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC34C1406E; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:30:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9685A13F10 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:30:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8227750573 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:28:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:26:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Scalability In-Reply-To: <20041007181527.98659.qmail@web8407.mail.in.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20041007181527.98659.qmail@web8407.mail.in.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Manoj Kumar Ampalam wrote: > Hi, > > Is spatial scalability enabled in the current version > of xvid1.0.2. no. Scalability is not a feature of MPEG-4 Visual "Simple Profile" or "Advanced Simple Profile" and those are the ones implemented by XviD. There is kind of support for activating reduced resolution frames, but since that isn't part of the profiles, it might be non working, break your monitor, burn down your house and also it's well possible that it's going to be removed from future versions. gruel _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 10 19:16:26 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA69E126D8B for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:16:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A42F14238; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:20:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from edgomez.kicks-ass.org (edgomez.kicks-ass.org [82.225.208.184]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7534140A9 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:20:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edy by edgomez.kicks-ass.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CGhIv-0004xJ-4p for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:16:17 +0200 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:16:17 +0200 From: Edouard Gomez To: xvid-devel ML Message-ID: <20041010171617.GA4064@edgomez.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Edouard Gomez , xvid-devel ML Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Subject: [XviD-devel] Recent ME changes X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org I was syncing my tree with public CVS and i was trying to figure out what changes were done in the diamond search. It appears that the 1.0 branch has a different fix than the head branch, basically, the head one does an early exit when iDirection is 0 (and uses a for loop, but that's only detail) while the 1.0 branch uses a do {} while loop, and doesn't have any early exit code so lot of stuff is still happeing before exiting. Christoph/sysKin, please see if two codes are equivalent. PS: i also remind to christoph who doesn't commit that often lately that fixes go to the 1.0 branch, and should not go to head only. -- Edouard Gomez _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 11 01:07:41 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBC0126D8B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:07:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2623B1483C; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:12:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from edgomez.kicks-ass.org (edgomez.kicks-ass.org [82.225.208.184]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BB5C02F for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:12:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edy by edgomez.kicks-ass.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CGmmt-0008W5-3z for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:07:35 +0200 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 01:07:35 +0200 From: Edouard Gomez To: xvid-devel ML Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Recent ME changes Message-ID: <20041010230735.GH4064@edgomez.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Edouard Gomez , xvid-devel ML References: <20041010171617.GA4064@edgomez.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041010171617.GA4064@edgomez.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Edouard Gomez (ed.gomez@free.fr) wrote: > Christoph/sysKin, please see if two codes are equivalent. I think it's equivalent, and just in case you're interested, i tested the patch against old code. See attachments. I'll resync both trees tomorrow. -- Edouard Gomez --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="test-new.txt" =============================================================================== Two pass test name: underworld-trailer First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 31,77 dB, u : 38,57 dB, v : 44,35 dB, in frame 2579 xvid: Average PSNR y : 39,20 dB, u : 42,97 dB, v : 45,36 dB, for 3531 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 99,99 dB, u : 99,99 dB, v : 99,99 dB, in frame 1745 Filesize: 16638812 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: pearl-harbor First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 33,54 dB, u : 39,06 dB, v : 39,64 dB, in frame 2746 xvid: Average PSNR y : 39,05 dB, u : 43,37 dB, v : 44,51 dB, for 2940 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 45,27 dB, u : 46,26 dB, v : 50,02 dB, in frame 2568 Filesize: 7898532 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: matrix-reloaded-trailer First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 29,19 dB, u : 32,63 dB, v : 32,28 dB, in frame 3404 xvid: Average PSNR y : 37,65 dB, u : 41,08 dB, v : 41,88 dB, for 3631 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 69,43 dB, u : 69,43 dB, v : 69,43 dB, in frame 119 Filesize: 14695378 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: matrix-reloaded-teaser First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 28,20 dB, u : 34,64 dB, v : 33,63 dB, in frame 1572 xvid: Average PSNR y : 36,72 dB, u : 41,10 dB, v : 40,91 dB, for 1887 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 99,99 dB, u : 64,00 dB, v : 64,00 dB, in frame 54 Filesize: 6818402 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: matrix-revolutions-trailer First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 29,12 dB, u : 35,76 dB, v : 32,11 dB, in frame 3275 xvid: Average PSNR y : 37,46 dB, u : 42,11 dB, v : 42,08 dB, for 3597 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 72,38 dB, u : 66,36 dB, v : 66,36 dB, in frame 794 Filesize: 14554752 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: matrix-reloaded-fightscene First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 32,84 dB, u : 38,52 dB, v : 40,81 dB, in frame 1002 xvid: Average PSNR y : 37,81 dB, u : 41,28 dB, v : 43,54 dB, for 5945 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 53,14 dB, u : 53,53 dB, v : 54,03 dB, in frame 1193 Filesize: 23574084 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: lotr-ttt First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 27,94 dB, u : 37,29 dB, v : 37,05 dB, in frame 323 xvid: Average PSNR y : 33,71 dB, u : 43,53 dB, v : 44,31 dB, for 1083 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 52,98 dB, u : 56,04 dB, v : 62,48 dB, in frame 908 Filesize: 5248390 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: futurama First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - 72dbef2cf5211984410c120591a5986b) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 34,60 dB, u : 45,17 dB, v : 46,68 dB, in frame 149 xvid: Average PSNR y : 38,69 dB, u : 41,14 dB, v : 40,59 dB, for 742 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 46,94 dB, u : 47,70 dB, v : 47,17 dB, in frame 706 Filesize: 3067030 bytes =============================================================================== --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="test-old.txt" =============================================================================== Two pass test name: underworld-trailer First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 31,50 dB, u : 34,20 dB, v : 38,06 dB, in frame 115 xvid: Average PSNR y : 39,15 dB, u : 42,94 dB, v : 45,33 dB, for 3531 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 99,99 dB, u : 99,99 dB, v : 99,99 dB, in frame 1745 Filesize: 16643064 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: pearl-harbor First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 33,55 dB, u : 39,02 dB, v : 39,62 dB, in frame 2740 xvid: Average PSNR y : 39,01 dB, u : 43,35 dB, v : 44,49 dB, for 2940 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 44,90 dB, u : 46,53 dB, v : 49,21 dB, in frame 2000 Filesize: 7869266 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: matrix-reloaded-trailer First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 29,42 dB, u : 36,50 dB, v : 32,79 dB, in frame 666 xvid: Average PSNR y : 37,60 dB, u : 41,03 dB, v : 41,85 dB, for 3631 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 69,43 dB, u : 69,43 dB, v : 69,43 dB, in frame 119 Filesize: 14608236 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: matrix-reloaded-teaser First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 28,22 dB, u : 34,66 dB, v : 33,59 dB, in frame 1572 xvid: Average PSNR y : 36,69 dB, u : 41,07 dB, v : 40,88 dB, for 1887 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 99,99 dB, u : 64,00 dB, v : 64,00 dB, in frame 54 Filesize: 6822872 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: matrix-revolutions-trailer First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 29,12 dB, u : 35,74 dB, v : 32,18 dB, in frame 3275 xvid: Average PSNR y : 37,43 dB, u : 42,10 dB, v : 42,06 dB, for 3597 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 72,38 dB, u : 66,36 dB, v : 66,36 dB, in frame 794 Filesize: 14572878 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: matrix-reloaded-fightscene First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 32,74 dB, u : 38,03 dB, v : 40,89 dB, in frame 2607 xvid: Average PSNR y : 37,76 dB, u : 41,24 dB, v : 43,51 dB, for 5945 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 53,14 dB, u : 53,53 dB, v : 54,03 dB, in frame 1193 Filesize: 23546932 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: lotr-ttt First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - ebffd716144b645ec3013b9db5fb1b4d) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 27,92 dB, u : 37,51 dB, v : 37,14 dB, in frame 325 xvid: Average PSNR y : 33,65 dB, u : 43,54 dB, v : 44,31 dB, for 1083 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 52,98 dB, u : 56,04 dB, v : 62,48 dB, in frame 908 Filesize: 5248658 bytes =============================================================================== =============================================================================== Two pass test name: futurama First pass stats missing. Performing first pass. Caching first pass stats Using cached first pass stats (hash - 72dbef2cf5211984410c120591a5986b) Results: xvid: Min PSNR y : 35,07 dB, u : 46,47 dB, v : 49,58 dB, in frame 145 xvid: Average PSNR y : 38,59 dB, u : 41,08 dB, v : 40,48 dB, for 742 frames xvid: Max PSNR y : 46,94 dB, u : 47,70 dB, v : 47,17 dB, in frame 706 Filesize: 3058122 bytes =============================================================================== --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 11 08:25:56 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF4C126D8B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:25:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0446E141DD; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:30:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from www.vuetec.com (195-226-141-186.bizdsl.guernsey.net [195.226.141.186]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D9613EF5 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:30:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vermivorous.cyp-internal.vuetec.com ([82.145.240.30]) by www.vuetec.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i9B6JKP10164 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 07:19:21 +0100 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:24:56 +0300 From: "Stuart Scott" Organization: VueTec Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) Subject: [XviD-devel] XviD Java Decoder X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi, I've translated the XviD Decoder into pure Java if anyone's interested... Stu... _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 11 08:36:45 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03CF126D8B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:36:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2979C81; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:41:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4599C50 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:41:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so200804rnk for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.65.2 with SMTP id n2mr122177rna; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.73.17 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3d51bb8d041010233673d54fb3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 02:36:36 -0400 From: Michael Wojciechowski To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] XviD Java Decoder In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Wojciechowski , xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org I'm interested :O On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:24:56 +0300, Stuart Scott wrote: > Hi, > > I've translated the XviD Decoder into pure Java if anyone's interested... > > Stu... > _______________________________________________ > XviD-devel mailing list > XviD-devel@xvid.org > http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel > _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 11 09:34:35 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CC5126D8B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:34:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A604814896; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:39:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F7414887 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:38:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imp6-q.free.fr (imp6-q.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE0722A594 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:34:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by imp6-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 8FC2C9444; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:34:27 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 195.101.164.38 ([195.101.164.38]) by imp6-q.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:34:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1097480067.416a37837fb50@imp6-q.free.fr> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:34:27 +0200 From: Edouard Gomez To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] XviD Java Decoder References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 195.101.164.38 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Selon Stuart Scott : > Hi, > > I've translated the XviD Decoder into pure Java if anyone's interested... Could you post a link so we can look at it ? I'm curious to see how you modelized the xvid internals into objects :-) -- Edouard Gomez _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 11 10:46:27 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D8E126D8B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:46:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0031426C; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:50:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from www.vuetec.com (195-226-141-186.bizdsl.guernsey.net [195.226.141.186]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FC014251 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:50:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vermivorous.cyp-internal.vuetec.com ([82.145.240.30]) by www.vuetec.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i9B8dnP17472 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:39:50 +0100 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] XviD Java Decoder References: <1097480067.416a37837fb50@imp6-q.free.fr> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:45:23 +0300 From: "Stuart Scott" Organization: VueTec Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1097480067.416a37837fb50@imp6-q.free.fr> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Not very well I'm afraid. It's ugly. It's messy. It's slow, but it works (mostly :-)). I've stuffed everything into the one package which i probably shouldn't have done. I should have proabably separated it like in the xvid code. I had to do it reasonably quickly for work so more time could have been spent. I'm kinda translating xvid_decraw atm so you've got something you know to test it with. I've never worked on any open source projects so when I'm done I'll then tar.bz2 it and attach it to an email? Stu... On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:34:27 +0200, Edouard Gomez wrote: > Selon Stuart Scott : >> Hi, >> >> I've translated the XviD Decoder into pure Java if anyone's >> interested... > > Could you post a link so we can look at it ? I'm curious to see how you > modelized the xvid internals into objects :-) > > -- > Edouard Gomez > _______________________________________________ > XviD-devel mailing list > XviD-devel@xvid.org > http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel > _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 11 11:45:17 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9779126D8B for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:45:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F58B14880; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:49:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from www.vuetec.com (195-226-141-186.bizdsl.guernsey.net [195.226.141.186]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88FB9CC6 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:49:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vermivorous.cyp-internal.vuetec.com ([82.145.240.30]) by www.vuetec.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i9B9chP20528 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:38:43 +0100 Organization: VueTec To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:44:15 +0300 From: "Stuart Scott" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) Subject: [XviD-devel] XviD Java Decoder X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Here it is. http://monitor.vuetec.com/sscott/xvid.tar.bz2 I've only implemented the rgb24 colourspace conversion as that's all i needed for our project. If you run xvid_encraw -i cactus.pgm -o my_xvid_example.m4v then copy my_xvid_example.m4v to the dir created by xvid.tar.bz2 and run ant run that *should* give you the same output as xvid_decraw -i my_xvid_example.m4v -d -f pnm -c rgb24 Hope everything works :-) Stu... _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Tue Oct 12 23:32:17 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3337E126D8B for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:32:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEFA14950; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:36:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from edgomez.kicks-ass.org (edgomez.kicks-ass.org [82.225.208.184]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB40C001 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edy by edgomez.kicks-ass.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CHUFa-00020j-BH for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:32:06 +0200 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:32:06 +0200 From: Edouard Gomez To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] XviD Java Decoder Message-ID: <20041012213206.GA7485@edgomez.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Edouard Gomez , xvid-devel@xvid.org References: <1097480067.416a37837fb50@imp6-q.free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Stuart Scott (stuart@vuetec.com) wrote: > I've never worked on any open source projects so when I'm done I'll then > tar.bz2 it and attach it to an email? Ok, i downloaded it this evening, i'm short on time because i received a amd64 port to merge so this java port ranks lower suddenly :-) Afaict, your release seems to comply with our license, so your work is legal :-) congrats for your first opensource project. Maybe we could end up with an applet for video streaming ? -- Edouard Gomez _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Wed Oct 13 08:16:20 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6310D126D8B for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:16:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D7914273; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:20:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from www.vuetec.com (195-226-141-186.bizdsl.guernsey.net [195.226.141.186]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B29C0D9 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:20:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vermivorous.cyp-internal.vuetec.com ([82.145.240.30]) by www.vuetec.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i9D69eP29967 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:09:41 +0100 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] XviD Java Decoder References: <1097480067.416a37837fb50@imp6-q.free.fr> <20041012213206.GA7485@edgomez.dyndns.org> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:14:47 +0300 From: "Stuart Scott" Organization: VueTec Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20041012213206.GA7485@edgomez.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.51 (Linux, build 689) X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Edouard Gomez wrote: > Stuart Scott (stuart@vuetec.com) wrote: >> I've never worked on any open source projects so when I'm done I'll then >> tar.bz2 it and attach it to an email? > > Ok, i downloaded it this evening, i'm short on time because i > received a amd64 port to merge so this java port ranks lower > suddenly :-) > > Afaict, your release seems to comply with our license, so your > work is legal :-) congrats for your first opensource project. Phew that's lucky! I'd probably be out of a job if it wasn't ;-) > Maybe we could end up with an applet for video streaming ? That's exactly what it's used for. Our implementation is not too fantastic yet but we're working on it. Slowly. There's a simple example on www.vuetec.com. Stu... _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Wed Oct 13 13:20:55 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE5F126D8B for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:20:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E7714961; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:25:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from scamper.lut.ac.uk (scamper.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.219]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA1F1495E for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [158.125.1.220] (helo=jamie.lut.ac.uk) by scamper.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CHhBX-0001kP-EY for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:20:47 +0100 Received: from apache by jamie.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.41) id 1CHhBX-0006Ne-89 for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:20:47 +0100 Received: from nervous-energy.lut.ac.uk (nervous-energy.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.114]) by student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:20:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1097666447.416d0f8f362f0@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:20:47 +0100 From: Tom Jacobs To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Changes to get_pmv2 References: <1096972701.4162799d7e590@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> <4162AE51.2000007@ihug.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4162AE51.2000007@ihug.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 158.125.1.114 X-Scan-Signature: 082cdb9c4a3cb29f426b241f5e64f242 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org hi i have implemented my mod of get_pmv2 to it uses top left instead of left and after the searches recalculated pmvs. this seems to work ok and gives me a simular psnr from the original as the unmodded code does. looking further into the search code i see there is get_pmvdata2. this seems to be doing a simular kind of operation. if i modify this in the same was as i have done for get_pmv2 will i have to do another recalculation? or can i just change it without a major degradation in quality? Thanks Tom _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sat Oct 16 12:44:41 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4098D126D8B for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:44:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966DCC012; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:49:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from kbw.ch (kbw.ch [62.2.169.166]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE33C008 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:49:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [62.167.129.192] (account chn HELO [192.168.0.102]) by kbw.ch (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 9728139 for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:42:36 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <7011BEA5-1F60-11D9-85CC-000A95772E90@kbw.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: xvid-devel@xvid.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christoph_N=E4geli?= Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:45:04 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: [XviD-devel] bounced X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi, I 'posted' a message 2 days ago that was bounced until the list administrator has time to have a look at it. How long will this go? And can someone tell me under what conditions a header looks suspicious. Perhaps this message will go through, then: Is someone listening with PPC Linux who can test the new PPC port on linux? (i.e. if it is compilable it should be ok) -- Christoph _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sat Oct 16 12:58:07 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE497126D8B for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:58:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9A314091; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:02:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from kbw.ch (kbw.ch [62.2.169.166]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A4314945 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:15:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [62.167.84.111] (account chn HELO [192.168.0.102]) by kbw.ch (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 9432091 for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:09:00 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: xvid-devel@xvid.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Christoph_N=E4geli?= Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:11:25 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:01:45 +0200 Subject: [XviD-devel] Searching for Linux PPC X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi I just finished some altivec routines and I have no ppc with linux installed. Is there anyone in this list that can confirm it is working? Download is: http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~naegelic/xvidcore.tar.bz2 Btw. This src is not synchronized with cvs head. To get recent changes you need to use tla to star-merge with Edouard's archive. -- Christoph _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sat Oct 16 13:02:09 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EDE126D8B for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:02:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB39141C8; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:06:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix, from userid 30) id 2A8EE141B2; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:06:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pD9539E42.dip.t-dialin.net (pD9539E42.dip.t-dialin.net [217.83.158.66]) by www.xvid.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:06:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1097924803.417100c314147@www.xvid.org> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:06:43 +0200 From: Michael Militzer To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] bounced References: <7011BEA5-1F60-11D9-85CC-000A95772E90@kbw.ch> In-Reply-To: <7011BEA5-1F60-11D9-85CC-000A95772E90@kbw.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 217.83.158.66 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi, if one of your messages get bounced, it may be wise to resent your e-mail with a different subject and not waiting for me to approve it. That's because around 100-200 messages are bounced every day due to being spam or virus mails (also often sent with fake sender addresses). I simply don't have the time to manually check each of these mails and usually discard all bounced mails every three or four days... bye, Michael Quoting Christoph Nägeli : > Hi, > > I 'posted' a message 2 days ago that was bounced until the list > administrator has time to have a look at it. > How long will this go? And can someone tell me under what conditions a > header looks suspicious. > > > Perhaps this message will go through, then: > Is someone listening with PPC Linux who can test the new PPC port on > linux? > (i.e. if it is compilable it should be ok) > > -- > Christoph > > _______________________________________________ > XviD-devel mailing list > XviD-devel@xvid.org > http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel > _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sat Oct 16 17:20:57 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA13D126D8B for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:20:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27851483C; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:25:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mailserv.aei.mpg.de (mailserv.aei.mpg.de [194.94.224.6]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3AB1461A for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:25:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mailserv.aei.mpg.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id BBE00289C6B; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:20:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailserv.aei.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE69289C69 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:20:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sshserv2.aei.mpg.de (sshserv2.aei.mpg.de [194.94.224.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailserv.aei.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4A6289C76 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:20:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:20:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Andre Werthmann To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mailserv.aei.mpg.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 Subject: [XviD-devel] xvid-1.0.2 x86_64 asm port X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org I have portet all of the x86_asm code to x86_64. The target in xvid is ARCH_IS_X86_64. Also the QPEL part of xvid wasnt working on a x86_64 target, I fixed the segfault problem. (This is in cvs stable now.) On my athlon64 3000+ box with the plain C version (fixed) I get ~6fps encoding a 720x576 with standard settings but qpel enabled. With the new assembler code I get ~25fps. I changed the configure.in script to detect a x86_64 target and set the proper assembler with the proper flags. The assembler used is yasm (needs to be >= yasm-r1154) with the flags "-f elf -m amd64" under linux. If you want to try it, download the tarball/or patch to xvid-1.0.2 below. x86-64.tar.bz2: http://www.aei.mpg.de/~wertmann/xvidcore-1.0.2-x86-64.tar.bz2 http://www.aei.mpg.de/~wertmann/xvidcore-1.0.2-x86-64.tar.bz2.md5 patch 1.0.2 -> 1.0.2-x86-64 modified: http://www.aei.mpg.de/~wertmann/xvidcore-1.0.2-amd64.patch.bz2 http://www.aei.mpg.de/~wertmann/xvidcore-1.0.2-amd64.patch.bz2.md5 -Andre. _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sat Oct 16 18:02:59 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0E7126D8B for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:02:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C49014040; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:07:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from edgomez.kicks-ass.org (edgomez.kicks-ass.org [82.225.208.184]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FEA9CAA for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:07:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edy by edgomez.kicks-ass.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CIr1C-0002y0-An for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:02:54 +0200 Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 18:02:54 +0200 From: Edouard Gomez To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] xvid-1.0.2 x86_64 asm port Message-ID: <20041016160254.GD3850@edgomez.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Edouard Gomez , xvid-devel@xvid.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Andre Werthmann (wertmann@aei.mpg.de) wrote: > I have portet all of the x86_asm code to x86_64. > The target in xvid is ARCH_IS_X86_64. > > Also the QPEL part of xvid wasnt working on a x86_64 target, I fixed the > segfault problem. (This is in cvs stable now.) Yup 64 bit fixes are already in cvs (both 1.0 and 1.1 tree). > On my athlon64 3000+ box with the plain C version (fixed) I get ~6fps > encoding a 720x576 with standard settings but qpel enabled. > With the new assembler code I get ~25fps. > > I changed the configure.in script to detect a x86_64 target and set the > proper assembler with the proper flags. The assembler used is yasm (needs > to be >= yasm-r1154) with the flags "-f elf -m amd64" under linux. 1.1 tree does the yasm testing already, so adding x86_64 is quite easy. > If you want to try it, download the tarball/or patch to xvid-1.0.2 > below. > > x86-64.tar.bz2: > http://www.aei.mpg.de/~wertmann/xvidcore-1.0.2-x86-64.tar.bz2 > http://www.aei.mpg.de/~wertmann/xvidcore-1.0.2-x86-64.tar.bz2.md5 > > patch 1.0.2 -> 1.0.2-x86-64 modified: > http://www.aei.mpg.de/~wertmann/xvidcore-1.0.2-amd64.patch.bz2 > http://www.aei.mpg.de/~wertmann/xvidcore-1.0.2-amd64.patch.bz2.md5 Do these tarballs have updated files compared to what you advertised a few days ago directly to me, just in case i need to update something on my side... Btw did you have the time to look at the head branch for the missing _add functions (hpel code) ? PS: PPC port will monopolize my today's time, tomorrow i'll start adding your 64bit asm files to head. -- Edouard Gomez _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sat Oct 16 19:59:37 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7846D126D8B for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 19:59:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3362514964; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:04:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 6373614960 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:04:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 17867 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Oct 2004 17:59:29 -0000 Received: from DSL01.212.114.232.7.NEFkom.net (EHLO DSL01.212.114.232.7.NEFkom.net) (212.114.232.7) by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 16 Oct 2004 19:59:29 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14339442 From: Henning Moll To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] segmentation fault Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 19:59:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200410031520.37833.newsScott@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410161959.08848.newsScott@gmx.de> X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi! some feedback: On Sunday 03 October 2004 17:35, Christoph Lampert wrote: > Definitely not. Nondeterministic errors are almost always due to > hardware. > [...] > Other programs produce other access patterns RAM and > instructions, you cannot be sure the problem would pop up somewhere > else. Hmm, it's realy hard to believe, that an error just occours on a single programm ( in this case a single codec), but at last it seems that you are right... > First thing I would suggest is to run a RAM checker overnight. Second > thing is to run a CPU-intensive thing (e.g. "cpuburn-in" for a > while), or possible both together. Ok, i did that in all possible combinations. Neither memtest nor cpuburn-in reported any problem. But interesting: cpuburn-in is not worth its name: xvid heated my CPU much more than cpuburn-in. In fact, i can use cpuburn-in to cool it down (!) a bit while running the xvid encoder. Maybe cpuburn-in is _that_ stress tool, but only for intel cpus...? I recommend xvid instead. ;-) Anyway, that little decrease of heat was not enough to avoid a segfault during the encoding process. So i opened the computer case and did some heavy external cooling by an ordinary ventilator. That way i was able to achieve several encodings without a segfault. Ok, i think that's proof enough to confirm a hardware failure. Now i will start to find the causing component by replace one after each other, starting with the cpu of course. Anyway, many thanks to you for your advice. Best regards Henning _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Wed Oct 20 12:20:36 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B173126D8B for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:20:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00FE14887; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:25:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from scamper.lut.ac.uk (scamper.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.219]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB19114887 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:25:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [158.125.1.222] (helo=torch.lut.ac.uk) by scamper.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CKDZv-0006lM-Dt for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:20:23 +0100 Received: from apache by torch.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.41) id 1CKDaA-0006Li-RO for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:20:38 +0100 Received: from quietly-confident.lut.ac.uk (quietly-confident.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.115]) by student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:20:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1098267638.41763bf6c62d7@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:20:38 +0100 From: Tom Jacobs To: xvid-devel@xvid.org References: <1096972701.4162799d7e590@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> <4162AE51.2000007@ihug.com.au> <1097666447.416d0f8f362f0@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <1097666447.416d0f8f362f0@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 158.125.1.115 X-Scan-Signature: b26f1aa00d4736e3106d228d48560036 Subject: [XviD-devel] test sequences X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org hi can anyone suggest some test video sequences i can use to verify that my changes work. the few videos i have at the moment do most of the functions but they do not having an intra coded MB in the FrameCodeP function. thanks Tom _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Wed Oct 20 12:31:15 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24493126D8B for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:31:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FED1498C; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:35:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix, from userid 30) id 7B05D1498B; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:35:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pD9539899.dip.t-dialin.net (pD9539899.dip.t-dialin.net [217.83.152.153]) by www.xvid.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:35:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1098268551.41763f8771a8d@www.xvid.org> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:35:51 +0200 From: Michael Militzer To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] test sequences References: <1096972701.4162799d7e590@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> <4162AE51.2000007@ihug.com.au> <1097666447.416d0f8f362f0@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> <1098267638.41763bf6c62d7@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <1098267638.41763bf6c62d7@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 217.83.152.153 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi, I don't know which sequences you already have. But some good sources for different material are: http://www.stewe.org/vceg.org/sequences.htm http://media.xiph.org/ http://www.cipr.rpi.edu/resource/sequences/ http://www.ldv.ei.tum.de/liquid.php?page=70 The Tempete or Mobile CIF sequences for example should give you some intra coded MBs also in P-frames. bye, Michael Quoting Tom Jacobs : > hi > > can anyone suggest some test video sequences i can use to verify that my > changes work. the few videos i have at the moment do most of the functions > but they do not having an intra coded MB in the FrameCodeP function. > > thanks > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > XviD-devel mailing list > XviD-devel@xvid.org > http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel > _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Thu Oct 21 15:47:24 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E223B126D83 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:47:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C52014157; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:52:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from scamper.lut.ac.uk (scamper.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.219]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF966C0A6 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:52:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [158.125.1.221] (helo=magic.lut.ac.uk) by scamper.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CKdHd-0003DL-PI for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:47:14 +0100 Received: from apache by magic.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.41) id 1CKdHd-0008QJ-H1 for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:47:13 +0100 Received: from quietly-confident.lut.ac.uk (quietly-confident.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.115]) by student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:47:13 +0100 Message-ID: <1098366433.4177bde179b61@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:47:13 +0100 From: Tom Jacobs To: xvid-devel@xvid.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 158.125.1.115 X-Scan-Signature: 082cdb9c4a3cb29f426b241f5e64f242 Subject: [XviD-devel] static variables in idct.c X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org hi i was wondering if there was a reason why some of the variables in idct.c are declared as static? i have run the code without the static and i get the same results. normally i wouldnt notice but on my parallel simulator static declares variables as shared instead of private so it made a difference. just wondered if there was a need for them to be static and thus i would have to look for another work around thanks Tom _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Fri Oct 22 02:03:53 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91C8126D83 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:03:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A16014040; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:08:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from edgomez.kicks-ass.org (edgomez.kicks-ass.org [82.225.208.184]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1048E84 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:08:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edy by edgomez.kicks-ass.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CKmuJ-0002Lu-LY for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:03:47 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:03:47 +0200 From: Edouard Gomez To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] static variables in idct.c Message-ID: <20041022000347.GA5599@edgomez.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Edouard Gomez , xvid-devel@xvid.org References: <1098366433.4177bde179b61@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1098366433.4177bde179b61@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Tom Jacobs (T.R.Jacobs@lboro.ac.uk) wrote: > just wondered if there was a need for them to be static and thus i would > have to look for another work around What version are you looking at ? This is supposed to be fixed in 1.0.2 as shown by this patchset: http://archzoom.sourcecontrol.net/demo/ed.gomez@free.fr--2004-1/xvidcore--stable--1.0--patch-53?log -- Edouard Gomez _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Fri Oct 22 04:57:21 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2926126D83 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 04:57:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC4214C92; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:02:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from MAIL.yulong.com (unknown [210.75.16.21]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7668314C8F for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:01:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dengxiongshu ([128.1.4.26]) by MAIL.yulong.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:59:07 +0800 Message-ID: <000801c4b7e2$c495f3b0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> From: =?gb2312?B?tcvQ28rp?= To: Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:56:45 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2004 02:59:07.0349 (UTC) FILETIME=[18B99050:01C4B7E3] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4 Subject: [XviD-devel] find a problem X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0449204161==" Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0449204161== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ZGVhciBhbGw6DQogICAgIHdoZW4gSSBjb21wcmVzcyBicmlkZ2UtZmFyLmNpZihsaWtlIGEgc3Rp bGwgaW1hZ2UsbGl0dGxlIG1vdmUpIHdpdGggeHZpZCBpbiBiaXRyYXRlIDM5MzIxNiBhbmQgaDI2 MyBxdWFudCxJIGZpbmQgcGljdHVyZSB3aWxsIGFwcGVhciBzb21lIHBpbmsgbGluZSBhbmQgc29t ZSBwaW5rIHJlZ2lvbiBpbiBhbGwgcGljdHVyZSxhbmQgc29tZSBiaXQgcGluayBwb250IGJlc2lk ZSBtb3VudGFpbiBlZGdlLlRoYXQgaXMgd2hhdCBpcyBjYWxsZWQgYmxvY2sgZWZmZWN0PyB3aGVu IGJpdHJhdGUgaXMgdXBncmFkZSAgdG8gOTAwSyBiaXRzICxwaWN0dXJlIHF1YWxpdHkgaXMgZ29v ZCBhIGxpdHRsZSwgYW5kICB3aGl0aCBtcGVnIHF1YW50LHBpY3R1cmUgaXMgZ29vZCAgYSBsaXR0 bGUgYnV0IHRoaXMgdGhpbmsgYWxzbyBleGlzdCwNCnNvbWUgb25lIGNhbiBtYWtlIHNvbWUgbWVh c3VyZSAgdG8gbWFrZSBwaWN0dXJlIHF1YWxpdHkgYmV0dGVyPw0KDQp4aW9uZ3NodSxkZW5n --===============0449204161== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel --===============0449204161==-- From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Fri Oct 22 06:43:36 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E91126D83 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 06:43:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E830914C29; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 06:48:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from MAIL.yulong.com (unknown [210.75.16.21]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D834E14C26 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 06:47:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dengxiongshu ([128.1.4.26]) by MAIL.yulong.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:45:08 +0800 Message-ID: <001201c4b7f1$93c6d7e0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> From: "???" To: Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:42:46 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2004 04:45:08.0311 (UTC) FILETIME=[E8275670:01C4B7F1] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4 Subject: [XviD-devel] find a problem X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1914640122==" Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1914640122== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ZGVhciBhbGw6DQogICAgIHdoZW4gSSBjb21wcmVzcyBicmlkZ2UtZmFyLmNpZihsaWtlIGEgc3Rp bGwgaW1hZ2UsbGl0dGxlIG1vdmUpd2l0aCB4dmlkIGluIGJpdHJhdGUgMzkzMjE2IGFuZCBoMjYz IHF1YW50LEkgZmluZCBwaWN0dXJlIHdpbGwgYXBwZWFyIHNvbWUgcGluayBsaW5lIGFuZCBzb21l IHBpbmsgcmVnaW9uIGluIGFsbCBwaWN0dXJlLGFuZCBzb21lIGJpdCBwaW5rIHBvbnQgYmVzaWRl IG1vdW50YWluIGVkZ2UuVGhhdCBpcyB3aGF0IGlzIGNhbGxlZCBibG9jayBlZmZlY3Q/IHdoZW4g Yml0cmF0ZSBpcyB1cGdyYWRlICB0byA5MDBLIGJpdHMgLHBpY3R1cmUgcXVhbGl0eSBpcyBnb29k IGEgbGl0dGxlLCBhbmQgIHdoaXRoIG1wZWcgcXVhbnQscGljdHVyZSBpcyBnb29kICBhIGxpdHRs ZSBidXQgdGhpcyB0aGluayBhbHNvIGV4aXN0LA0Kc29tZSBvbmUgY2FuIG1ha2Ugc29tZSBtZWFz dXJlICB0byBtYWtlIHBpY3R1cmUgcXVhbGl0eSBiZXR0ZXI/DQoNCnhpb25nc2h1LGRlbmc= --===============1914640122== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel --===============1914640122==-- From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Fri Oct 22 09:55:19 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7695126D83 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:55:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D767F14C0C; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:00:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80192C014 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:59:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54093C31D for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:57:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:55:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] find a problem In-Reply-To: <001201c4b7f1$93c6d7e0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> Message-ID: References: <001201c4b7f1$93c6d7e0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, ??? wrote: > dear all: > when I compress bridge-far.cif(like a still image,little move)with > xvid in bitrate 393216 and h263 quant,I find picture will appear some > pink line and some pink region in all picture,and some bit pink pont > beside mountain edge.That is what is called block effect? No, that's something else. What version of XviD are you using, and what program do you use for encoding? gruel _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Fri Oct 22 10:59:03 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFAA126D83 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:59:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4414714C0F; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:03:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from MAIL.yulong.com (unknown [210.75.16.21]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839A714978 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:03:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dengxiongshu ([128.1.4.26]) by MAIL.yulong.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:00:53 +0800 Message-ID: <001401c4b815$4e743880$1a040180@dengxiongshu> From: "???" To: Subject: [XviD-devel] find a problem Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:58:32 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2004 09:00:53.0500 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2995BC0:01C4B815] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1810586220==" Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1810586220== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ZGVhciBhbGw6DQogIEkgdXNlIHZlcnNpb24gb2YgbGlieHZpZGNvcmUgMS4wLjEgIHRvIGNvbXBy ZXNzIHJhdyB5dXYgdGVzdF9zZXF1ZW5jZSBicmlkZ2UtZmFyLmNpZixhbmQgZmluZCBzb21lIHBp bmsgbGluZSBhbmQgcGluayByZWdpb24gYXJlIHNvIGFidmlvdXMgaW4gY29uZGl0aW9uIG9mIGJp dHJhdGUgMzkzMjE2IGFuZCBoLjI2MyBxdWFudCxidXQgSSBmaW5kIGV2ZW4gd2l0aCA5MDBrIGJp dHJhdGUgb3IgbXBlZzQgcXVhbnQgdGhpbmdzIGlzIGFsc28gZXhpdHMsYnV0IHF1YWxpdHkgaXMg Z29vZCBhIGxpdHRsZS5JIHRoaW5rIGxvd2VyIGJpdHJhdGUgZXZlbiB3b3JzZS5idXQgdGhlIG90 aGVyIHRlc3Qgc2VxdWVuY2UgZG9lcyBub3QgaGF2ZSB0aGlzIGNpcmN1bXN0YW5jZS5XaG8gY2Fu IGV4cGxhaW4gdGhpcyBjb25kaXRpb24/IGRvZXNuJ3QgaXQgYmxvY2sgZWZmZWN0PyBJIHRoaW5r IGl0IGlzIGJsb2NrIGVmZmVjdCBhbmQgc2hvdWxkIGVsaW1pbmF0ZSBpdC4NCnRoYW5rcw0KeGlv bmdzaHUgZGVuZw== --===============1810586220== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel --===============1810586220==-- From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Fri Oct 22 12:17:57 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE213126D83 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:17:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D8214C1C; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:22:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD04814C18 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:22:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40151522FE for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:20:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:17:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] find a problem In-Reply-To: <001401c4b815$4e743880$1a040180@dengxiongshu> Message-ID: References: <001401c4b815$4e743880$1a040180@dengxiongshu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, ??? wrote: > dear all: > I use version of libxvidcore 1.0.1 to compress raw yuv test_sequence > bridge-far.cif, What _application_ or _program_ do you use to encode the raw YUV sequence? > and find some pink line and pink region are so abvious in > condition of bitrate 393216 and h.263 quant,but I find even with 900k > bitrate or mpeg4 quant things is also exits,but quality is good a > little.I think lower bitrate even worse.but the other test sequence does > not have this circumstance.Who can explain this condition? doesn't it > block effect? I think it is block effect and should eliminate it. thanks I don't understand what you mean by "abvious", but the pink region/line are _not_ block artefacts, because block artefacts are blocks, and pink lines are not blocks. Do you have a sample sequence (just a few encoded frames) which you could put for download or send to me as e-mail? Not the full clip and not to the list, please, because it's too large for that. gruel _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Fri Oct 22 13:56:44 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D800B126D83 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:56:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD98C006; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:01:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from MAIL.yulong.com (unknown [210.75.16.21]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CFF14085 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:01:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dengxiongshu ([128.1.4.26]) by MAIL.yulong.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:58:34 +0800 Message-ID: <000801c4b82e$2101f7c0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> From: "???" To: Subject: [XviD-devel] Re:find a problem Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 19:56:13 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2004 11:58:34.0352 (UTC) FILETIME=[74F64700:01C4B82E] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1581976677==" Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1581976677== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ZGVhciBMYW1wZXJ0Og0KICAgIHlvdSBjYW4gZG93biBsb2FkIHNvbWUgdGVzdCBzZXF1ZW5jZSBm cm9tOg0KaHR0cDovL3RyYWNlLmVhcy5hc3UuZWR1L3l1di9jaWYuaHRtbA0KeW91IGNhbiBjb21w cmVzcyBicmlkZ2UtZmFyLmNpZiBhcyBteSBkbyB3aXRoIDM4NGsgYml0cmF0ZXMgYW5kIGgyNjNx dWFudCxJdCBpcyByYXcgeXV2IGZpbGUuU29ycnkgZm9yIG15IHBvb3IgbWlzdGFrZSx0aGUgImFi dmlvdXMiIHNob3VsZCBiZSAib2J2aW91cyIuDQp0aGFua3MNCiA= --===============1581976677== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel --===============1581976677==-- From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Fri Oct 22 16:57:19 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC77126D83 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:57:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE78914C45; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:02:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFADE14C23 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:02:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011AF29D4B for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:59:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:57:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Re:find a problem In-Reply-To: <000801c4b82e$2101f7c0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> Message-ID: References: <000801c4b82e$2101f7c0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, ??? wrote: > dear Lampert: > you can down load some test sequence from: > http://trace.eas.asu.edu/yuv/cif.html > you can compress bridge-far.cif as my do with 384k bitrates and > h263quant,It is raw yuv file.Sorry for my poor mistake,the "abvious" > should be "obvious". thanks Sorry, I cannot help you if you don't really answer my questions. I know where to download the bride-far.cif sequence. If I didn't, I would have asked for it. But I still don't know, with _what program_ you encode the raw sequence. xvid_encraw? mencoder? VirtualDub? a selfwritten application? And when operating system do you use? Windows? Or Linux? MacOS? When I encode the bridge-far.cif using xvid_encraw under Linux, there are no pink lines or similar, no matter what the bitrate is. So, I either need the exact command line or procedure you use for encoding, or a part of the _resulting_ output MPEG-4 file. chl _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sat Oct 23 04:24:19 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B04126D83 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 04:24:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08141426D; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 04:29:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from MAIL.yulong.com (unknown [210.75.16.21]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320F31416A for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 04:28:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dengxiongshu ([128.1.4.26]) by MAIL.yulong.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:25:56 +0800 Message-ID: <000f01c4b8a7$4d9ef9d0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> From: "???" To: Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:23:37 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2004 02:25:56.0218 (UTC) FILETIME=[A054D5A0:01C4B8A7] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4 Subject: [XviD-devel] Re:find a problem X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2004796570==" Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============2004796570== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ZGVhciBMYW1wZXJ0Og0KICAgICBJIGVuY29kZXIgYnJpZGdlLWZhci5jaWYgd2l0aCBwcm9ncmFt IHh2aWRfZW5jcmF3LHVzZSB3aW5kb3dzIHhwLHRoZSBjb21tYW5kIGxpbmUgaXMgZm9sbG93aW5n Og0KLXNpbmdsZSAtYml0cmF0ZSAzOTMyMTYgIC13IDM1MiAtaCAyODggICAtaSAgRTpcYnJpZGdl LWZhci5jaWYgIC1vICBlbmJyaWRnZS1mYXIybC5jaWYuDQphbmQgSSBzZW5kIG15IHRvdGFsIGVu Y29kZWQgIDI3MCBmcmFtZSB0byB5b3VyIHByaXZhdGUgZV9tYWlsLGRvIHlvdSBzZWUgdGhlIHBp bmsgbGluZSBhbmQgcGluayBwb2ludCBhcmUgbW9yZSBhbmQgbW9yZSBvYnZpb3VzbHkgd2hlbiBt b3JlIGNsb3NlIHRvIHRoZSBzZWNvbmQgSSBmcmFtZS5Tb3JyeSBmb3IgbXkgcG9vciBlbmdsaXNo IGFuZCBzb21ldGltZXMgc3BlbGxpbmcgbWlzdGFrZS4NCnRoYW5rcyBmb3IgeW91ciBoZWxwIQ0K eGlvbmdzaHUsZGVuZw0KDQo= --===============2004796570== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel --===============2004796570==-- From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sat Oct 23 11:51:38 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185B2126D83 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:51:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51D114C7E; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:56:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B781014C7A for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:56:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB114E383 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:53:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:51:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Re:find a problem In-Reply-To: <000f01c4b8a7$4d9ef9d0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> Message-ID: References: <000f01c4b8a7$4d9ef9d0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-595391112-1123546601-1098525092=:6773" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---595391112-1123546601-1098525092=:6773 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Hello, okay, now I might have found your problem. Do your pink line/point look in any way like the attached JPEG image? Did you decode the file with a different codec then XviD, e.g. DivX or ffmpeg? And does the pink completely disappear at the next I-frame? Then you have found one of the biggest (but known) problems of MPEG-4: encoder/decoder iDCT mismatch. Depending on which decoder you use, rounding errors can appear, and in some sequences, they become more and more visible. Normally, this doesn't happen when the decoder and the encoder are from the same codec, but here it seems it did. We'll have to analyze the reasons, thank you for your report. gruel On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, ??? wrote: > dear Lampert: > I encoder bridge-far.cif with program xvid_encraw,use windows xp,the command line is following: > -single -bitrate 393216 -w 352 -h 288 -i E:\bridge-far.cif -o enbridge-far2l.cif. > and I send my total encoded 270 frame to your private e_mail,do you see > the pink line and pink point are more and more obviously when more close > to the second I frame.Sorry for my poor english and sometimes spelling > mistake. thanks for your help! xiongshu,deng > > ---595391112-1123546601-1098525092=:6773 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel ---595391112-1123546601-1098525092=:6773-- From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sat Oct 23 11:59:35 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865EC126D83 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:59:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E9914C84; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:04:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA3A14C77 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:04:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3E45192D for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:01:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:59:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Re:find a problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <000f01c4b8a7$4d9ef9d0$1a040180@dengxiongshu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Christoph Lampert wrote: > okay, now I might have found your problem. > Do your pink line/point look in any way like the attached JPEG image? > Did you decode the file with a different codec then XviD, e.g. DivX or > ffmpeg? And does the pink completely disappear at the next I-frame? > > Then you have found one of the biggest (but known) problems of MPEG-4: > encoder/decoder iDCT mismatch. Hello again, after I checked my installation, I believe the problem (if it is the mismatch I described) is not a problem of XviD itself, but of different versions installed, such that a different codec is used for encoding than for decoding. Could you check your Windows to ensure that only one version of XviD is installed (the latest)? gruel _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 24 19:13:25 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA705126D85 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:13:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FBC1462C; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:18:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mwinf0512.wanadoo.fr (smtp5.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.26]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3597814260 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:18:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0512.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id DC51518000CA for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:13:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from blackbird.bzh (Mix-Rennes301-2-29.w193-250.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.250.83.29]) by mwinf0512.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 665A318000ED for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:13:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Sketches.bzh (Sketches.bzh [192.168.1.66]) by blackbird.bzh (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6E9D149 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:12:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Sketches.bzh (Postfix, from userid 500) id 62CD81DB9B; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:12:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Guillaume POIRIER To: xvid-devel ML Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098637948.4706.69.camel@Sketches> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:12:28 +0200 Subject: [XviD-devel] divx5bvop and XviD-1.x.x X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi there, In the attempt to transcode a file with XviD that would be hopefully playable with divx reader, I tried to use the option named "divx5bvop" in MEncoder front-end, only to find out that this option existed in the old API, but is no more in API-4 and up. I want to update MPlayer doc mark that option as depreciated. Could you guys maybe tell me if that DivX "compatibility" mode still exists in come way or go completely removed? (For example 4mv doesn't exist in 1.x.x alone but got merged in me_quality>4). Regards, Guillaume _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 24 23:00:02 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285AB126D85 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:00:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0779314237; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:04:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A6E14122 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:04:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8B351A8E for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:02:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:59:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel ML Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] divx5bvop and XviD-1.x.x In-Reply-To: <1098637948.4706.69.camel@Sketches> Message-ID: References: <1098637948.4706.69.camel@Sketches> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Guillaume POIRIER wrote: > In the attempt to transcode a file with XviD that would be hopefully > playable with divx reader, I tried to use the option named "divx5bvop" > in MEncoder front-end, only to find out that this option existed in the > old API, but is no more in API-4 and up. > I want to update MPlayer doc mark that option as depreciated. > Could you guys maybe tell me if that DivX "compatibility" mode still > exists in come way or go completely removed? (For example 4mv doesn't > exist in 1.x.x alone but got merged in me_quality>4). XviD still supports "packed mode" for B-VOPs, which IIRC is the old DivX "compatiblity" mode. However, since DivXnetworks finally noticed what a bad idea it was to store B-VOPs that way, they changed their decoder themselves, so "packed mode" is now compatiblity for completely outdated DivX-decoders only, it should therefore not be used. In principle, any XviD encoded file should play with recent DivX as well, and to make it run on hardware players as well, you might have to not use Qpel and GMC. chl _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Sun Oct 24 23:17:31 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B81F126D85 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:17:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7936314157; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:22:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix, from userid 30) id 43359140E8; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:22:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pD95391DC.dip.t-dialin.net (pD95391DC.dip.t-dialin.net [217.83.145.220]) by www.xvid.org (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:22:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1098652941.417c1d0d346e2@www.xvid.org> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:22:21 +0200 From: Michael Militzer To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] divx5bvop and XviD-1.x.x References: <1098637948.4706.69.camel@Sketches> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 217.83.145.220 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Quoting Christoph Lampert : > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Guillaume POIRIER wrote: > > In the attempt to transcode a file with XviD that would be hopefully > > playable with divx reader, I tried to use the option named "divx5bvop" > > in MEncoder front-end, only to find out that this option existed in the > > old API, but is no more in API-4 and up. > > I want to update MPlayer doc mark that option as depreciated. > > Could you guys maybe tell me if that DivX "compatibility" mode still > > exists in come way or go completely removed? (For example 4mv doesn't > > exist in 1.x.x alone but got merged in me_quality>4). > > XviD still supports "packed mode" for B-VOPs, which IIRC is the > old DivX "compatiblity" mode. However, since DivXnetworks finally noticed > what a bad idea it was to store B-VOPs that way, they changed > their decoder themselves, so "packed mode" is now compatiblity for > completely outdated DivX-decoders only, it should therefore not be used. hu??? Afaik, the DivX compatibility mode simply forced B_VOPs to not reference from future I_VOPs. Moreover, I don't know of any change in recent DivX versions that would reflect DXN having realized that 'packed mode' would be evil. Afaik, the DivX 5.2.1 encoder still produces packed b-frame streams and the DivX decoder supports non-packed b-frame decoding already since version 5.0. Michael _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 04:52:18 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FEB126D85 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 04:52:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B6614C58; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 04:57:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from MAIL.yulong.com (unknown [210.75.16.21]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E269514C35 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 04:57:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dengxiongshu ([128.1.4.26]) by MAIL.yulong.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:53:55 +0800 Message-ID: <000e01c4ba3d$8f287060$1a040180@dengxiongshu> From: "???" To: Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:51:42 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2004 02:53:55.0779 (UTC) FILETIME=[DE410130:01C4BA3D] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.4 Subject: [XviD-devel] Re:find a problem X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0174309628==" Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0174309628== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGk6DQogICAgSSBpcyBub3QgZmFtaWx5IHdpdGggSlBFRzQgc28gSSBjb3VsZG4ndCBhbnN3ZXIg dGhlIGZpcnN0IHF1ZXN0aW9uLiBJICBlbmNhcHN1bGF0ZSBteSBlbmNvZGVkIGZyYW1lIHRvIGF2 aSBidXQgZGl2eCBjb3VsZCBub3QgY29ycmVjdCBkZWNvZGUgLGNvdWxkIHlvdSB0ZWxsIG1lIGhh dmUgc29tZSBiaW5hcnkgZXhlY3V0ZSBmaWxlIGNhbiBlbmNvZGUgcmF3IHl1diBhbmQgZW5jYXBz dWxhdGUgIGl0IHRvIGF2aT8gWWVzICx0aGUgcGluayBjb21wbGV0ZWx5IGRpc2FwcGVhciBhdCB0 aGUgbmV4dCBJIGZyYW1lLiBJIHdhcyBzdXJlIGluIG15IHdpbmRvdyAgdGhlIHZlcnNpb24gb2Yg eHZpZCBteSBpbnN0YWxsZWQgaXMgb25seSAxLjAuMS4NCiAgIHRoYW5rcw0KeGlvbmdzaHUsIGRl bmc= --===============0174309628== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel --===============0174309628==-- From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 09:13:22 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B69126D85 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:13:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE21E14C8B; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:18:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600A314C87 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:18:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8FB4DC89 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:15:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:13:15 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] divx5bvop and XviD-1.x.x In-Reply-To: <1098652941.417c1d0d346e2@www.xvid.org> Message-ID: References: <1098637948.4706.69.camel@Sketches> <1098652941.417c1d0d346e2@www.xvid.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Michael Militzer wrote: > > hu??? Afaik, the DivX compatibility mode simply forced B_VOPs to not > reference from future I_VOPs. Oh, sorry, that was it? That's "XVID_GLOBAL_CLOSED_GOP" flag now, see xvid.h include file: chl /*---------------------------------------------------------------------------- * "Global" flags * * These flags are used for xvid_enc_create_t->global field during instance * creation (operation XVID_ENC_CREATE) *--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ #define XVID_GLOBAL_PACKED (1<<0) /* packed bitstream */ #define XVID_GLOBAL_CLOSED_GOP (1<<1) /* closed_gop: was DX50BVOP dx50 bvop compatibility */ #define XVID_GLOBAL_EXTRASTATS_ENABLE (1<<2) _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 09:39:12 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B86126D85 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:39:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C25514C85; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:44:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69289C8B for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:43:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA9847DE8 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:41:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:39:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] Re:find a problem In-Reply-To: <000e01c4ba3d$8f287060$1a040180@dengxiongshu> Message-ID: References: <000e01c4ba3d$8f287060$1a040180@dengxiongshu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, ??? wrote: > I is not family with JPEG4 so I couldn't answer the first question. > I encapsulate my encoded frame to avi but divx could not correct > decode ,could you tell me have some binary execute file can encode > raw yuv and encapsulate it to avi? Yes ,the pink completely disappear > at the next I frame. I was sure in my window the version of xvid my > installed is only 1.0.1. Hello, I got your encoded file, and yes, the problem is due to IDCT mismatch. What program did you use to decode this raw MPEG-4 stream? If you use e.g. xvid_decraw and look at output images, it should be okay. Also, if you encode and decode with the same codec, the problem shouldn't be there. Maybe there is an old version of XviD installed on your system somewhere, you should try to de-install everything XviD-related from your computer and then install latest XviD only. gruel _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 11:15:20 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296F3126D85 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:15:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD7F14CE3; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:20:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from grunt21.ihug.com.au (grunt21.ihug.com.au [203.109.249.141]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490F0AB55 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:20:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dsl-167.161.240.220.lns02-waym-adl.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.161.167] by grunt21.ihug.com.au with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CM0wS-0002GU-00; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:15:04 +1000 Message-ID: <417CC45A.8060102@ihug.com.au> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:46:10 +0930 From: Radek Czyz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] divx5bvop and XviD-1.x.x References: <1098637948.4706.69.camel@Sketches> <1098652941.417c1d0d346e2@www.xvid.org> In-Reply-To: <1098652941.417c1d0d346e2@www.xvid.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Michael Militzer wrote: > Moreover, I don't know of any change in > recent DivX versions that would reflect DXN having realized that 'packed > mode' would be evil. Afaik, the DivX 5.2.1 encoder still produces > packed b-frame streams and the DivX decoder supports non-packed b-frame > decoding already since version 5.0. Actually, thats not that simple. DivX still produces packed streams but only in "fixed b-frames" (or whatever it was called) setting. If you tell it to use P/B decision (which sucks compared to ours pretty badly ;> ) DivX will not produce packed streams. Also, their method of encoding and decoding packed streams is - currently - much better than ours. They no longer create dummy N-VOPs on encoding and they don't need userdata string for decoding. XviD's packed bitstream handling is pretty poor, both or encoding and decoding side :( The bottom line here is, it's different. Radek _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 12:53:13 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ED8126D85 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:53:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEE914C6B; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:58:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from hotmail.com (bay13-dav2.bay13.hotmail.com [64.4.31.176]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7710C14C68 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:58:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 03:53:01 -0700 Received: from 150.101.167.39 by BAY13-DAV2.phx.gbl with DAV; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:52:21 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [150.101.167.39] X-Originating-Email: [suxen_drol@hotmail.com] X-Sender: suxen_drol@hotmail.com Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:52:26 +1000 From: suxen_drol To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] divx5bvop and XviD-1.x.x In-Reply-To: <417CC45A.8060102@ihug.com.au> References: <1098652941.417c1d0d346e2@www.xvid.org> <417CC45A.8060102@ihug.com.au> Message-Id: <20041026084129.BF3B.SUXEN_DROL@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.09.01 [en] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2004 10:53:01.0255 (UTC) FILETIME=[CBE48D70:01C4BA80] X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org g'day On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 18:46:10 +0930 Radek Czyz wrote: > Also, their method of encoding and decoding packed streams is - > currently - much better than ours. They no longer create dummy N-VOPs on > encoding and they don't need userdata string for decoding. > XviD's packed bitstream handling is pretty poor, both or encoding and > decoding side :( The bottom line here is, it's different. yet another bug: content encoded using the divx P/B decision mode, stutters on playback with the xvid decoder. cheers, -- pete; whoever invented up with packed-bframes should be *certified* _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 14:21:17 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFDC126D85 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:21:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D057148E6; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:26:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from scamper.lut.ac.uk (scamper.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.219]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA719142C6 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:26:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [158.125.1.221] (helo=magic.lut.ac.uk) by scamper.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CM3qO-0007ne-42 for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:21:02 +0100 Received: from apache by magic.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.41) id 1CM3qM-0005Ax-7K for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:20:58 +0100 Received: from nervous-energy.lut.ac.uk (nervous-energy.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.114]) by student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:20:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1098706858.417cefaa305fa@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:20:58 +0100 From: Tom Jacobs To: xvid-devel@xvid.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 158.125.1.114 X-Scan-Signature: 5a36bda3904d05fd053fd54b64d98d6d Subject: [XviD-devel] testing process X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org hi i have nearly finished by threading of xvid and am looking more closely at testing my code. i have numerous test sequences in qcif format. what is the best way to test my work? i think i would like to know the psnr of my modified code against the original image and an unmodified xvid so i can see how my modifications affect the over all performance of the codec. i can get the compressed mp4 back into qcif if that helps but i don't know what programme would be best to use to obtains some results thanks Tom _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 14:33:36 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727D1126D8F for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:33:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B6114C5A; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:38:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr (postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F961496A for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:38:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imp1-q.free.fr (imp1-q.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268C1164FE9 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:33:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by imp1-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 136E236E52; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:33:28 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 195.101.164.38 ([195.101.164.38]) by imp1-q.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:33:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1098707608.417cf29802d41@imp1-q.free.fr> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:33:28 +0200 From: Edouard Gomez To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] testing process References: <1098706858.417cefaa305fa@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <1098706858.417cefaa305fa@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 195.101.164.38 X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Selon Tom Jacobs : > i have nearly finished by threading of xvid and am looking more closely at > testing my code. i have numerous test sequences in qcif format. what is the > best way to test my work? i think i would like to know the psnr of my > modified code against the original image and an unmodified xvid so i can > see how my modifications affect the over all performance of the codec. i > can get the compressed mp4 back into qcif if that helps but i don't know > what programme would be best to use to obtains some results First of all, your modifications should not impact one thread coding, which means that for a single thread encoder, the resulting bitstream should be 1:1 with non threaded encoder, eg: test it with md5sum. For all threaded cases, you have two ways to test your code: - see how bigger streams are at constant quantizer (this measure the loss in coding efficiency caused by the ME zones splitting) - see how much PSNR you lose at constant file size (2pass coding). And depending on your code changes, maybe all multi threaded cases should behave exactly the same, in that case test resulting streams with md5sum, if not then just forget about this. examples/xvid_encraw allows all that, PSNR tracking, framesize tracking etc... just feed it with raw yuv streams and choose the right options for your tests. xvid_encraw has the advantage to be a very thin layer upon xvidcore, so you're sure nothing introduces bugs in between xvidcore and the demuxer. Once xvid_encraw validate your changes, you can give a try at a normal test series with your favorite encoding app. -- Edouard Gomez _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 14:44:45 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9971126D85 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:44:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A93B14C78; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:49:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from mailrelais2.univ-rennes1.fr (mailrelais2.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.128.64]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05C114C71 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:49:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelais2.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F197113433 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:44:29 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailrelais2.univ-rennes1.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelais2.univ-rennes1.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23441-01-62 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:44:26 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailimailo.univ-rennes1.fr (mailimailo.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.131.1]) by mailrelais2.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6351347B for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:44:26 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [148.60.5.131] (i214m04.ifsic.univ-rennes1.fr [148.60.5.131]) by mailimailo.univ-rennes1.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7D1435 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:44:26 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <417CF529.70505@etudiant.univ-rennes1.fr> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:44:25 +0200 From: Guillaume POIRIER Organization: IFSIC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] divx5bvop and XviD-1.x.x References: <1098637948.4706.69.camel@Sketches> <1098652941.417c1d0d346e2@www.xvid.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at univ-rennes1.fr X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi, Christoph Lampert wrote: > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Michael Militzer wrote: > >>hu??? Afaik, the DivX compatibility mode simply forced B_VOPs to not >>reference from future I_VOPs. > > > Oh, sorry, that was it? > That's "XVID_GLOBAL_CLOSED_GOP" flag now, see xvid.h include file: Ok, thanks a lot for your kind replies... I'm unfortunately still a bit puzzled about what I should write about divx5bvop with XviD-1.x.x? Should I just say that it's now called "closed_gop" and that's it? ...Or should I add that given that b-frames aren't really coded the same way, this option allows a bitstream to be closer to DivX's, but not completely equivalent? Regards, Guillaume _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 15:12:46 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6E6126D85 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1932714C7E; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:17:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from scamper.lut.ac.uk (scamper.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.219]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BD914C5F for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 15:17:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [158.125.1.221] (helo=magic.lut.ac.uk) by scamper.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CM4eK-00024R-Vt for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:12:38 +0100 Received: from apache by magic.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.41) id 1CM4eK-0008TW-FJ for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:12:36 +0100 Received: from nervous-energy.lut.ac.uk (nervous-energy.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.114]) by student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:12:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1098709956.417cfbc46c448@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:12:36 +0100 From: Tom Jacobs To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] testing process MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 158.125.1.114 X-Scan-Signature: 9d0ec86c4eea3f902fd4fa0f87b62f0e X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org hi i have a few probs with using xvid_encraw. firstly my implementation is not for x86 it is for a simplescalar architecture which is run on a simulator on my x86 Linux box. xvid_encraw doesn't seam to like being compiled with my compiler ( i dont think it is linking with any of the other xvid stuff, it complains that nothing is declared). i think this may be because i installed/got libxvidcore. is there away of doing the testing separate from the encoding? so i can encode on the simulator and then use normal x86 tools to test the output? when looking at my results i wont quite have the 1:1 copy for my single thread version (although it is just a macro switch away ;) this is because i have slightly modified get_pmvs2 and get_pmvdata2. this was done so that it never did the prediction from the left MB it used top left instead. pmvs have although been reevaluated with the correct MB so that the decoding can be done correctly. not sure how much that has made sense but baasically the search is done with a 'wrong' prediction which doesn't use the left MB. due to this the single threaded wont be the same as the stock xvid code. all the extra threads although do produce the same file as this single threaded version. so what i am trying to show is that a) my modification at single thread doesn't have a great detrimental affect on the encoder, and once this is acceptable b) show that by using more threads a huge complexity reduction can be achieved hope all that makes sense thanks for your help Tom Quoting Edouard Gomez : > Selon Tom Jacobs : > > i have nearly finished by threading of xvid and am looking more closely > at > > testing my code. i have numerous test sequences in qcif format. what is > the > > best way to test my work? i think i would like to know the psnr of my > > modified code against the original image and an unmodified xvid so i > can > > see how my modifications affect the over all performance of the codec. > i > > can get the compressed mp4 back into qcif if that helps but i don't > know > > what programme would be best to use to obtains some results > > First of all, your modifications should not impact one thread coding, > which > means that for a single thread encoder, the resulting bitstream should be > 1:1 > with non threaded encoder, eg: test it with md5sum. > > For all threaded cases, you have two ways to test your code: > - see how bigger streams are at constant quantizer (this measure the > loss in > coding efficiency caused by the ME zones splitting) > - see how much PSNR you lose at constant file size (2pass coding). > > And depending on your code changes, maybe all multi threaded cases should > behave > exactly the same, in that case test resulting streams with md5sum, if not > then > just forget about this. > > examples/xvid_encraw allows all that, PSNR tracking, framesize tracking > etc... > just feed it with raw yuv streams and choose the right options for your > tests. > > xvid_encraw has the advantage to be a very thin layer upon xvidcore, so > you're > sure nothing introduces bugs in between xvidcore and the demuxer. Once > xvid_encraw validate your changes, you can give a try at a normal test > series > with your favorite encoding app. > > -- > Edouard Gomez > _______________________________________________ > XviD-devel mailing list > XviD-devel@xvid.org > http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel > _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Mon Oct 25 16:40:32 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2F8126D85 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:40:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437B514C0F; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:45:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from nil.math.uni-bonn.de (nil.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.11]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44CA14607 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:45:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from login.math.uni-bonn.de (login.math.uni-bonn.de [131.220.120.13]) by nil.math.uni-bonn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5B152D12 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:42:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:40:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Christoph Lampert To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] testing process In-Reply-To: <1098709956.417cfbc46c448@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Message-ID: References: <1098709956.417cfbc46c448@student-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Tom Jacobs wrote: > i have a few probs with using xvid_encraw. firstly my implementation is not > for x86 it is for a simplescalar architecture which is run on a simulator > on my x86 Linux box. xvid_encraw doesn't seam to like being compiled with > my compiler ( i dont think it is linking with any of the other xvid stuff, > it complains that nothing is declared). xvid_encraw is a very simple application, it just reads from standard input, initializes some structures and calls the XviD-library. If you got XviD compiled (or simulated or so), xvid_encraw should definitely compile somehow as well. If not, you can write whatever encoding application you want, of course. xvid_encraw is mainly meant as a sceleton to show how this could be done. > i think this may be because i > installed/got libxvidcore. is there away of doing the testing separate from > the encoding? so i can encode on the simulator and then use normal x86 tools > to test the output? What exactly is the output of your simulator, and what do you want to test? XviD library has a builtin PSNR calculation, that should be working independently of xvid_encraw. You don't have to store the resulting MPEG-4 stream or really decode it again. > so what i am trying to show is that a) my modification at single thread > doesn't have a great detrimental affect on the encoder, and once this is > acceptable b) show that by using more threads a huge complexity reduction > can be achieved Point a) I believe, point b) I don't ;-) gruel _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Wed Oct 27 19:07:53 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4EF126D82 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:07:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3D01426C; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:12:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from weber.sscnet.ucla.edu (weber.sscnet.ucla.edu [128.97.42.3]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8C3141D1 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:12:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by weber.sscnet.ucla.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9RH7aVc020211 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from weber.sscnet.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (weber [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19711-01-2 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.97.185.211] (dgyznx01.sscnet.ucla.edu [128.97.185.211]) by weber.sscnet.ucla.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9RH7D0C020030 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <417FD5C0.4030407@cogweb.net> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:07:12 -0700 From: David Liontooth User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at weber.sscnet.ucla.edu Subject: [XviD-devel] xvid-1.0.2 x86_64 asm port X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Hi Edouard -- *Edouard Gomez* ed.gomez at free.fr wrote on 16 Oct 2004: >Andre Werthmann (wertmann at aei.mpg.de ) wrote: >>/ I have portet all of the x86_asm code to x86_64. >/>/ The target in xvid is ARCH_IS_X86_64./ > >tomorrow i'll start adding your 64bit asm files to head. > Is this code in the daily snapshot? (http://files.xvid.org/downloads/xvid_latest.tar.gz) Are there special build instructions on amd64? I'm looking forward to test it! Cheers, Dave _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel From xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Wed Oct 27 20:52:06 2004 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from edu.bnhof.de (edu.bnhof.de [213.167.167.52]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE36126D82 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:52:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edu.bnhof.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A199414C0D; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:56:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Delivered-To: xvid-devel@edu.bnhof.de Received: from edgomez.kicks-ass.org (edgomez.kicks-ass.org [82.225.208.184]) by edu.bnhof.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F7714607 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from edy by edgomez.kicks-ass.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CMstm-0001kf-Bj for xvid-devel@xvid.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:51:54 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:51:54 +0200 From: Edouard Gomez To: xvid-devel@xvid.org Subject: Re: [XviD-devel] xvid-1.0.2 x86_64 asm port Message-ID: <20041027185154.GA6607@edgomez.dyndns.org> Mail-Followup-To: Edouard Gomez , xvid-devel@xvid.org References: <417FD5C0.4030407@cogweb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <417FD5C0.4030407@cogweb.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-BeenThere: xvid-devel@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-devel@xvid.org List-Id: xvid-devel.xvid.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-devel-bounces@xvid.org David Liontooth (liontooth@cogweb.net) wrote: > >tomorrow i'll start adding your 64bit asm files to head. > > > Is this code in the daily snapshot? > (http://files.xvid.org/downloads/xvid_latest.tar.gz) > > Are there special build instructions on amd64? > > I'm looking forward to test it! Not yet, i'm still waiting for some answers from the port author concerning a few issues i raised. I'm probably going to ask him again, but the port is almost a add thing patch, so it'll get merged very fast once i'm satisfied by the code. -- Edouard Gomez _______________________________________________ XviD-devel mailing list XviD-devel@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-devel