From xvid-users-bounces@xvid.org Tue Oct 3 11:56:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: itdp@fh-biergarten.de Delivered-To: itdp@localhost Received: from s8.lansco.de (s8.lansco.de [85.10.209.66]) by mail.kliche.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E63D126D82 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:56:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s8.lansco.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B761A8297; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s8.lansco.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (s8.lansco.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28270-05; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:56:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s8.lansco.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s8.lansco.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45221A82B8; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:56:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Original-To: xvid-users@s8.lansco.de Delivered-To: xvid-users@s8.lansco.de Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s8.lansco.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0C71A826E for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:56:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from s8.lansco.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (s8.lansco.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28224-06 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:56:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from web37701.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web37701.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.87.99]) by s8.lansco.de (Postfix) with SMTP id C91611A5F92 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 11:56:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 93341 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Oct 2006 09:55:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=el3xFSz6EaHFg9t6lhcWRgSurPIBi0vqB+x38+7UrUzRmOZtlie4F4k7B+VY7jtcBPrSXA9HBkxVHDphEhXRkSWLBQhcL/GvQ7ZUeKQgCetULB+CwUVXh4TAdfD1goUwPvbGHoLILT2tT0cvCwJc38/vGKkcxrapVTQlMtJ0co0= ; Message-ID: <20061003095556.93339.qmail@web37701.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.127.125.237] by web37701.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:55:56 PDT Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 02:55:56 -0700 (PDT) From: p_j_r_m To: xvid-users@xvid.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lansco.de Subject: [XviD-users] X86_64 compilation X-BeenThere: xvid-users@xvid.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6 Precedence: list Reply-To: xvid-users@xvid.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1504031722==" Sender: xvid-users-bounces@xvid.org Errors-To: xvid-users-bounces@xvid.org X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lansco.de --===============1504031722== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-213927041-1159869356=:91931" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --0-213927041-1159869356=:91931 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi I am a Xvid newbie compiling last xvid 1.1.0 for a X86_64 architecture, but configure seems to produce (by default) makefiles with generic source, without using assembler sources for x86_64. (ARCHITECTURE=-DARCH_IS_GENERIC appears un platform.inc) #./configure configure:1388: checking build system type configure:1406: result: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu configure:1414: checking host system type configure:1428: result: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu configure:1436: checking target system type configure:1450: result: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu configure:1466: checking whether to use default CFLAGS configure:1470: result: yes configure:1524: checking for gcc configure:1540: found /usr/bin/gcc configure:1550: result: gcc configure:1794: checking for C compiler version configure:1797: gcc --version &5 gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-56) Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ... ...etc Its not clear to me if I must execute something as configure --build=x86_64 or similar. If so, are the assembler sources correct for X86_64 architecture ? Are they worth using? Thanks --------------------------------- Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business. --0-213927041-1159869356=:91931 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi

I am a Xvid newbie compiling last xvid 1.1.0 for a X86_64 architecture, but configure seems to produce  (by default) makefiles with generic source, without using assembler sources for x86_64. (ARCHITECTURE=-DARCH_IS_GENERIC appears un platform.inc)

#./configure
configure:1388: checking build system type
configure:1406: result: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
configure:1414: checking host system type
configure:1428: result: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
configure:1436: checking target system type
configure:1450: result: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
configure:1466: checking whether to use default CFLAGS
configure:1470: result: yes
configure:1524: checking for gcc
configure:1540: found /usr/bin/gcc
configure:1550: result: gcc
configure:1794: checking for C compiler version
configure:1797: gcc --version </dev/null >&5
gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-56)
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
...
...etc

Its not clear to me if I must execute something as configure --build=x86_64 or similar. If so, are the assembler sources correct for X86_64 architecture ? Are they worth using?

Thanks


Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business. --0-213927041-1159869356=:91931-- --===============1504031722== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ XviD-users mailing list XviD-users@xvid.org http://list.xvid.org/mailman/listinfo/xvid-users --===============1504031722==--